Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 3.10
(
continued
)
26
+
+
+
27
+
+
+
28
+
+
+
29
+
+
+
30
+
+
+
31
+
+
+
32
+
+
+
33
+
+
+
34
+
+
+
35
+
+
+
36
+
+
+
37
+
+
+
38
+
+
+
39
+
+
+
40
+
+
+
Table 3.11
Parameters of membership functions of the formalized expert approaches to the
plants state evaluation
Membership
function
X
X
X
1
2
3
μ
(0; 0,013; 0; 0,025)
(0; 0,025; 0; 0)
(0; 0,013; 0; 0,025)
i
(0,038; 0,038; 0,025;
0,025)
(0,038; 0,038; 0,025;
0,025;
μ
(0,025; 0,025; 0; 0)
i
2
(0,063; 0,063; 0,025;
0,025)
μ
(0,025; 0,050; 0; 0,050) (0,063; 0,063; 0,025; 0,025
i
3
(0,088; 0,113; 0,025;
0,075)
(0,100; 0,100; 0,050;
0,050)
μ
(0,088; 0,088; 0,025; 0,025
i
4
(0,188; 0,275; 0,075;
0,250)
(0,150; 0,275; 0,050;
0,300)
μ
(0,113; 0,263; 0,025; 0,325
i
5
(0,525; 0,738; 0,250;
0,175)
(0,575; 0,775; 0,300;
0,150)
μ
(0,588; 0,850; 0,325; 0,100
i
6
μ
(0,913; 1,000; 0,175; 0)
(0,925; 1,000; 0,150; 0)
(0,950; 1,000; 0,100; 0)
i
7
Parameters of membership function of term-sets of the formalized approaches
are summarized in Table 3.11.
Having substituted a sign "+” in Table 3.10 with the parameters of
corresponding membership functions, we obtain the formalized expert results.
The additive index (3.24) of general consistency of the formalized evaluation
results obtained by three experts is equal to 0.53, that is evidence of competence
of the experts.
