Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 3.9
(
continued
)
(0,675;0,7;0,15;0,2)
(0,625;0,85;0,15;0,1)
(0,725;1;0,15;0)
(0,15;0,1;0,2)
(0,325;0,15;0,15)
(0,125;0,05;0,05)
(0,525;0,15;0,15)
(0,475;0,15;0,15)
(0,575;0,15;0,15)
(0,15;0,1;0,2)
(0,075;0,175;0,05; 0,15)
(0;0,075;0;0,05)
(0,9;1;0,2;0)
(0;95;1;0,1;0)
(0,725;1;0,15;0)
(0,675;0,7;0,15;0,2)
(0,625;0,85;0,15;0,1)
(0,575;0,15;0,15)
(0,35;0,375;0,2;0,15)
(0,325;0,15;0,15)
(0,175;0,225;0,05;0,15)
(0,15;0,1;0,2)
(0,075;0,175;0,05;0,15)
(0,175;0,225;0,05;0,15)
(0,675;0,7;0,15;0,2)
(0,625;0,85;0,15;0,1)
(0,575;0,15;0,15)
(0,9;1;0,2;0)
(0;95;1;0,1;0)
(0,725;1;0,15;0)
(0,525;0,15;0,15)
(0,625;0,85;0,15;0,1)
(0,725;1;0,15;0)
(0;0,05;0;0,1)
(0,325;0,15;0,15)
(0,175;0,225;0,05;0,15)
(0,525;0,15;0,15)
(0,475;0,15;0,15)
(0,375;0,425;0,15;0,15)
(0,35;0,375;0,2;0,15)
(0,075;0,175;0,05;0,15)
(0,375;0,425;0,15;0,15)
(0,9;1;0,2;0)
(0,625;0,85;0,15;0,1)
(0,725;1;0,15;0)
(0,9;1;0,2;0)
(0,625;0,85;0,15;0,1)
(0,725;1;0,15;0)
(0,35;0,375;0,2;0,15)
(0,075;0,175;0,05;0,15)
(0,375;0,425;0,15;0,15)
Results of the 3rd expert differ from results of all experts, but they are closer to
results of the 1st and 6th experts.
Based on the research carried out, the conclusion is drawn that the results
obtained by the third expert essentially differs from all results. It is confirmed by
the fact that the system of results without his results included has the following
general consistency indexes: additive — 0.266, multiplicative — 0.252.
Considering that results of experts are divided into two similar groups, indexes of
consistency for two subsystems {2, 4, 5}, and {1, 3, 6} are obtained. The first
subsystem has additive and multiplicative indexes equal to 0.522 and 0.5204, and
the second subsystem — 0.503 and 0, accordingly.
Example 3.4. The analysis of results of an expert evaluation of “large-leaved
linden” species state.
Three experts estimated the state of 40 of “large-leaved
linden” plants i
n a
center of Moscow. For this purpose the verbal scale with seven
levels
(
)
l
was used: “old dead standing tree”, “recent dead standing
trees”, "partial mortal (drying)", "very weakened tree", “mean weakened tree”,
"moderately weakened tree", “vigorous tree without weakening signs”
[148—149]. The obtained dat
a a
re pr
ovi
ded in Table 3.10.
Let us denote with
=
1
7
X
(
)
a
i
l
=
ll
a relative amount of the trees referred by
i
-th expert to
l
-th level of a state. The data obtained are shown below.
1
=
1
7
