Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Confidence level
Cluster
0,59
{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}
0,63
{1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}, {3}
0,81
{1,4,6,7,8,9}, {3}, {2,5,10}
0,83
{1,4,6,7,8,9}, {3}, {2,5}, {10}
0,88
{1,4,6,8,9}, {3}, {2}, {5}, {10}
0,92
{1,6,8}, {3}, {2}, {5}, {10},{4,7}, {9}
1
{1}, {2}, {3}, {4}, {5}, {6}, {7}, {8}, {9}, {10}
Thus, one can understand that the state of correspondence of computers (needed
to ensure students' studies) availability in the classrooms of high school does not
meet the appropriate requirement to the complete extent. State of correspondence
of courseware issued by high school, research activity of students, integration of
science and education spheres, and the existing scale of evaluation of students'
knowledge to the current requirements of the training quality is more or less in line.
Example 3.3. The analysis of results of an expert evaluation of courseware
quality.
Six independent experts estimated characteristic «correspondences to
curricula» of 20 samples of tutorials. The evaluation was performed within the
limits of a verbal scale with six levels: “lack of correspondence”, “correspondence
in accessorial sections”, “correspondence in basic sections”, “correspondence in
the majority of the basic sections”, “correspondence in all basic sections”,
“complete correspondence”.
Table 3.6
Results of an expert evaluation
Expert
Tutorials
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
6
5
6
5
5
6
2
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
4
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
2
2
3
2
3
2
6
5
4
5
4
4
5
7
1
1
1
2
2
1
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
9
5
4
5
5
5
5
10
3
3
3
3
3
3
11
3
2
3
2
2
3
12
5
5
5
5
5
5
13
6
6
6
6
6
6
14
6
5
6
4
5
6
15
3
3
3
1
3
3
16
4
4
4
4
4
4
