Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Tabl e 4. 4 Examples of soft sensors for grades and density in flotation
Reference
Model
class
Main features
Applications, tests
Dynamic
and static
empirical
models
SS based on transfer function
model empirical relations for
froth density estimation in col-
umn flotation used in conjunction
with expert fuzzy system to pre-
vent froth collapse.
Tests by simulation.
Chuk et al. ,
2005 [18]
ARX
Stepwise regression. Comparison
of concentrate grade soft sensors
with and without clustering.
Tests of rougher flotation grade
using data from an industrial
grinding plant. Clustered SS
gives remarkably better RMS and
correlation.
Espinoza et
al. , 1995 [26]
NARX
Concentrate grade SS. Stepwise
regression. Gray models. Com-
parison between soft-sensor mod-
els (large prediction span) and
control
Tests using data from an indus-
trial rougher flotation plant and
from a model.
Gonzalez et
al. , 1994 [30]
models
(low
prediction
span
and
forcible
inclusion
of
some manipulated variables).
Various
Local soft sensor models us-
ing various models stemming
from a general model struc-
ture: ARMAX, NARX NAR-
MAX, cluster, neural networks,
fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno, and com-
binations of them. Comparisons.
Data
Test using concentrate grade data
from industrial rougher flotation
plant .
Gonzalez et
al. , 2003 [31]
validation
for
soft-sensor
design.
Extraction
of fea-
tures of
measured
variables
(images)
SS giving froth characteristics on
the basis of froth image analysis,
including characteristics dynam-
ics.
Installed
in flotation plant
and
used in expert control loops.
Hyotyniemi,
2000 [32]
Notation: LIP = Linear-in-parameters; NARMAX = Nonlinear ARMAX; NN = Neural Net-
work; SVM = Support Vector Machine SS = Soft Sensor; PCA = Principal Component Anal-
ysis; RMS = root mean square;
Search WWH ::




Custom Search