Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 4 Breakdown of the
composition dependence of
w into the contributions
resulting from the two steps
of dilution (cf. Fig. 1 and ( 32 ),
a 1.599, n 0.398, and
zl 1.074) for the CH/
PVME 28 system at 35 C
4
a
(1- nj ) 2
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
- zl (1+2 j )
-3
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
j
CH
PVME 28
1.5
Fig. 5 Interrelation between
the leading parameters of
( 32 ). Closed symbols data
from A 2 (M) [ 39 ]; open
symbols data from w( ' )[ 23 ].
Each symbol stands for a
different polymer/solvent
system, the polymers being
PS, PMMA, polyisobutylene,
and PDMS
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
a
1.5
manner: Both terms can be split into their enthalpy and entropy parts, as will be
shown later.
Another point of view on the contributions of the two terms of ( 32 ) deserves
special attention. Namely, the expectation according to the present approach that
their leading parameters, a and z, should not be independent of each other.
The reason for this surmise lies in the fact that contact formation and conforma-
tional relaxation share the same thermodynamic background, i.e., the effects of the
conformational relaxation of the components should strongly correlate with the
effects of contact formation, as discussed in Sect. 2 .
The results shown in Fig. 5 demonstrate that there indeed exists such a general
interrelation, where each data point represents a certain system and temperature.
The results of this graph demonstrate the consistency of the approach because the
data [ 39 ] obtained from the evaluation of the molecular weight dependence of A 2
(cf. Fig. 2 ) and from the composition dependence of w(
'
) (an example [ 40 ] is shown
in Fig. 3 ) lie on the same line [here zl = (0.957
0.5)], despite the
fundamentally different experimental methods used for their determination. For the
common representation of the data, the z values reported in table 2 of [ 39 ] were
multiplied by
0.00027)
(a
0.5 (i.e., l was set at 0.5), which is permissible for sufficiently large
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search