Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 7.5 Effects of ligand sterics and electronics on C-I reductive
elimination.
L
L
L
-L
Pd
Pd
I
Pd
I
I
L
O
O
O
7.53
7.50a
7.54
reductive
elimination
I
O
7.52a
DG z
(kcal mol 1 )
Entry
Ligand (%)
P t Bu 3
1
24.9
FcP t Bu 2
2
23.7
P i Pr 3
3
26.3
P(OMe) 3 a
4
26.9
PMe 3 a
5
36.9
PH 3 a
6
30.5
a Resting state is a Pd II L 2 species.
Δ G = 11.9 kcal/mol
L
O
β -H elimination
Pd
7.57
I
Pd(P t Bu 3 ) 2
I
I
G
Δ
= 29.6 kcal/mol
O
O
7.56
reductive elimination
7.55
O
7.58
Scheme 7.29 Comparison of b-hydride elimination and reductive elimination path-
ways. Adapted from Ref. 100 with permission.
7.7.4 Competing b-Hydride Elimination
Experimental results demonstrate that when monosubstituted olefin 7.55 is
subjected to the standard carbohalogenation conditions, only products such
as 7.57, resulting from a Heck reaction, are observed (Scheme 7.29). The
competing b-hydride elimination pathway was calculated and compared
with the desired carbohalogenation reaction. The computations show that
b-hydride elimination is an extremely facile process with a transition-state
energy of 11.9 kcal mol 1 . The barrier for carbon-halogen reductive elim-
ination, on the other hand, was calculated to be 29.6 kcal mol 1 . Therefore,
avoiding b-hydride elimination is a challenging goal that will require the
development of more specialized catalyst systems.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search