Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Hanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2001). Choice modelling approaches: A superior
alternative for environmental valuation?
Journal of Economic Surveys, 15
(3), 435-462.
Hanley, N., Shogren, J. F., & White, B. (1997).
Environmental economics in theory and practice
.
Houndmill/London: MacMillan.
Hanley, N., Whitby, M., & Simpson, I. (1999). Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy
in the UK.
Land Use Policy, 16
, 67-80.
Heal, G. (2000).
Nature and the marketplace; capturing the value of ecosystem services.
Washington, DC/Covelo, CA: Island Press.
Hodge, I., & McNally, S. (1998). Evaluating the environmentally sensitive areas: The value of
rural environments and policy relevance.
Journal of Rural Studies, 14
(3), 357-376.
Ison, S., Peake, S., & Wall, S. (2002).
Environmental issues and policies
. Harlow: Pearson
Education.
Jacobs, M. (1997). Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision
making institutions. In J. Foster (Ed.),
Valuing nature? Economics, ethics and environment
(pp. 211-231). London: Routledge.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect
and the Coase theorem.
Journal of Political Economy, 98
(6), 1325-1348.
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M., Bugg, R. L., Fay, J. P., & Thorp, R. W. (2004). The area requirements
of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California.
Ecology
Letters, 7
(11), 1109-1119.
Krumalova, V., Prazan, J., & Drlik, J. (2000).
Valuation of selected public goods related to
agriculture ('Ohodnocení Vybraných Veřejných Tatků Pocházejících ze Zemědělství') (in Czech)
.
Prague: Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, Report for the Ministry of Agriculture
of the Czech Republic.
Kubickova, S. (2004). Contingent valuation of the landscape amenity function of agriculture in the
Protected Landscape Area White Carpathians. In M. Ščasný & J. Melichar (Eds.),
Development of
the Czech society in the European Union. Part V: Nonmarket valuation methods in environmental
area
(pp. 259-268). Prague: Matfyzpress, Charles University Environment Center.
Levin, S. A. (1999).
Fragile dominion; complexity and the commons
. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., & Covich, A. (2000). Measuring the total economic
value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent
valuation survey.
Ecological Economics, 33
(1), 103-117.
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000).
Stated choice methods; analysis and
applications
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNeely, J. A., Gadgil, M., Leveque, C., Padoch, C., & Redford, K. (1995). Human influences
on biodiversity. In V. H. Heywood (Ed.),
Global biodiversity assessment
(pp. 711-821).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melichar, J., & Ščasný, M. (2004). Introduction to non-market valuation methods and critical review
of their application in the Czech Republic. In M. Ščasný & J. Melichar (Eds.),
Development of
the Czech society in the European Union. Part V: Nonmarket valuation methods in environmental
area
(pp. 43-94). Prague: Matfyzpress, Charles University Environment Center.
Mooney, H. A., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1997). Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. In G. C. Daily
(Ed.),
Nature's services; societal dependence on natural ecosystems
(pp. 11-19). Washington,
DC: Island Press.
Navrud, S. (2001). Comparing valuation exercises in Europe and the United States - challenges
for benefit transfer and some policy implications. In
OECD. Valuation of biodiversity studies;
selected studies
(pp. 63-77)
.
Paris: OECD.
Navrud, S., & Ready, R. (eds). (2007).
Environmental value transfer: Issues and methods
.
Dordrecht: Springer.
NOAA. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation.
Federal Register, 58
(10),
4601-4614.
Nunes, P. A. L. D., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2001). Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense
or nonsense?
Ecological Economics, 39
(2), 203-222.
