Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
many f fluctuations in the reported data may be partly due to the fact that these
systems are very sensitive to variations in the reaction conditions. This, how-
ever, is not be very helpful for their use as
•
OH probes.
It is seen from Table 3.5 that in the 2-hydroxybenzoate system, for example,
the yields of the 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acids are close to 1:1 when the
precursor radicals are oxidized by O
2
, but in the absence of an oxidant this ratio
is around 9:1. For the detection of
•
OH in cellular or in in v ivo systems, it is hence
not sufficient that these products are formed, but the second requirement is that
an adequate oxidant is present (for example,
a sufficiently high O
2
tension must
be maintained) in order to guarantee that they are formed in a 1:1 ratio. Experi-
ments have been carried out with rats that were given high doses of salicylic acid
as a probe for
•
OH formation induced by the drug (Ste-Marie et al. 1996). Much
more 2,5- than 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid was detected (cf. Table 3.8). The au-
thors realized that the second requirement of this probe was not fulfilled and
stated that there was still the possibility that the drug had induced a metabolic
oxidation of salicylic acid yielding mainly 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid. Never-
theless, when this paper was later cited in the literature, it was taken as a proof
for
•
OH formation under these conditions. We would like to emphasize here that
both requirements, formation of the 2,3- and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acids and
their 1:1 ratio, is necessary in order to ascertain
•
OH formation. It is noted that
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid is formed in the reaction of salicylic acid with sin-
glet dioxygen (O
2
1
∆
g
) (Kalyanaraman et al. 1993). More importantly, it may also
result from enzyme reactions (Ingelman-Sundberg et al. 1991). Especially the
latter makes it difficult if not impossible to ever observe a 1:1 ratio. Whether
the suggestion to only concentrate on 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid formation for
•
OH detection (Ingelman-Sundberg et al. 1991) is an adequate solution remains
debatable.
3.5.2
Spin Traps
Hydroxyl-radical spin trapping (and detection by EPR) would be a direct detec-
tion method [e.g., reaction (67); k = 2
10
9
dm
3
mol
−1
s
−1
]. Besides reacting with
•
OH, spin traps also react with O
2
•
−
[e.g., reaction (66);
k
= 10 dm
3
mol
−1
s
−1
] and
the HO
2
•
adduct to DMPO has only a short lifetime of about 8 min [reaction (68);
Pou et al. 1989; Rosen et al. 1994].
Although the difference in rate between
•
OH and O
2
•
−
scavenging by the
spin trap is eight orders of magnitude, the yield of the O
2
•
−
-spin-adduct may be
considerably higher, because of the usually much higher steady-state concentra-
tion of O
2
•
−
. In vivo, steady-state concentrations of O
2
•
−
have been estimated at
around 10
−11
to 10
−10
mol dm
−3
(Boveris and Cadenas 1997) and those of
•
OH at
some 10
−20
mol dm
−3
(the latter using too low a scavenger capacity in our opin-
ion, i.e., the
•
OH steady-state concentration would be at least an order of magni-
tude lower). As a consequence, its eight orders of magnitude lower rate is more
than compensated by the ten (or more) orders of magnitude higher steady-state
concentration of O
2
•
−
. Thus, in a biological system, spin trapping of O
2
•
−
will
strongly dominate, and the decay of its adduct, reaction (68), may lead to the
×
Search WWH ::
Custom Search