Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
The allylic Thy radical is observed by EPR in Thd (Catterall et al. 1992) and TMP
(Hildenbrand 1990). The identification of the
C
(6)-OH-5-yl radical by EPR sup-
ports the view (Deeble et al. 1990) that reaction with water competes with a de-
protonation at methyl. Due to the ready oxidation of the (reducing)
C
(5)-OH-6-yl
radicals by peroxodisulfate, this type of radical is only observed at low peroxo-
disulfate concentrations in these systems, i.e. the (oxidizing)
C
(6)-OH-5-yl
radicals may be correspondingly enriched (Schulte-Frohlinde and Hildenbrand
1989) (note that the nucleobases themselves are not oxidized at a reasonable rate
unless deprotonated; Moschel and Behrman 1974). These reducing
C
(5)-OH-6-
yl radicals are capable of reacting with peroxodisulfate and thus induce chain
reactions which in the case of 1,3Me
2
Ura shows some very interesting properties
(Schuchmann et al. 1987). It is nearly independent of the peroxodisulfate con-
centration, but shows a marked dependence on the 1,3Me
2
Ura concentration.
From this, it immediately follows that the mechanism is
not
characterized by the
reaction of the reducing
C
(5)-OH adduct radical with peroxodisulfate as the rate
determining step [reaction (30),
k
= 2.1
10
5
dm
3
mol
−1
s
−1
], yielding
exclusively
SO
4
2−
, the glycol [via the carbocation and water, reaction (32)]. This would be
the trivial case of an SO
4
•
−
-induced chain reaction (cf. Schuchmann and von
Sonntag 1988; Ulanski and von Sonntag 1999). One rather has to consider that
in this reaction the 1,3Me
2
Ura carbocation, SO
4
•
−
and SO
4
2−
are formed within
the cage [reaction (30)]. There, the carbocation may recombine with either of
the two anions or react with water [reactions (31)−(33)]. When the carbocation
reacts with SO
4
•
−
[reaction (33)], a new oxidizing species is formed which, how-
ever, is not as reactive as SO
4
•
−
. It propagates the chain with only a slow rate
×
Search WWH ::
Custom Search