Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 5.3
Physiological Efficiency of Lowland Rice under Different N Levels
Nitrogen Rate (kg ha
−1
)
Physiological Efficiency (kg kg
−
1
)
30
156
60
166
90
182
120
132
150
146
180
126
210
113
Average
146
0.62
**
R
2
Source:
Adapted from Fageria, N. K. and V. C. Baligar. 2001.
Commun. Soil Sci. Plant
Anal.
32:1405-1429.
**Significant at the 5% probability level.
where GY
f
is the grain yield of the fertilized plot, GYf
uf
is the grain yield of the unfertilized plot, N
uf
is the N uptake of the fertilized plot (grain plus straw), and N
uuf
is the N uptake of the unfertilized
plot (grain plus straw).
Fageria and Baligar (2001) determined the APE of lowland rice under variable N levels (Table 5.4).
The APE varied from 46 to 75 kg kg
−1
, with an average value of 63 kg kg
−1
. The APE was sig-
nificantly influenced by N levels and the variation was 87% with the addition of N in the range of
30-210 kg ha
−1
. Fageria et al. (2007) reported that APE among five lowland rice genotypes varied
from 56 to 123 kg kg
−1
, with an average value of 77 kg kg
−1
. The Average APE (average of two loca-
tions and various N levels) in lowland rice reported by Thind et al. (2010) was 42 kg kg
−1
. Gerik
et al. (1994) reported that cotton requires 16-20 kg of N per 100 kg of lint. This translates into
NUEs of 5.0-6.6 kg of lint per kg of N uptake.
TABLE 5.4
Agrophysiological Efficiency of Lowland Rice under Different N Levels
Nitrogen Rate (kg ha
−1
)
Agronomic Efficiency (kg kg
−
1
)
30
72
60
73
90
75
120
66
150
57
180
51
210
46
Average
63
0.87
**
R
2
Source:
Adapted from Fageria, N. K. and V. C. Baligar. 2001.
Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal
.
32:1405-1429.
**Significant at the 5% probability level.