Conservation and Efficiency - Energy Policy Analysis: A Conceptual Framework - page 179

Figure 10.4 The Costs of Energy Conservation and Efficiency Technologies

$

Environmental
costs

Dollar
costs

National security
costs

tors, often without large capital investments. Every individual can take part and reap the benefits,
from making very small changes to large ones.

REFERENCES

Barker, Terry, and Athanasios Dagoumas. 2009. “The Global Macroeconomic Rebound Effect of Energy
Efficiency Policies.” PowerPoint presentation, Cambridge Energy Forum and 4CMR Seminar on the
Rebound: Could Energy Efficiency Improvements Backfire?, Cambridge, UK, May 14.
Belzer, D.B. 2009. Energy Efficiency Potential in Existing Commercial Buildings: Review of Selected Recent
Studies . Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Brown, Rich, Sam Borgeson, Jon Koomey, and Peter Biermayer. 2008. U.S. Building-Sector Energy Efficiency
Potential . Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Diesendorf, Mark. 2007. Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy . Sydney: University of New South
Wales Press.
Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI). 2006a. “Energy-Efficient Buildings: Using Whole Build-
ing Design to Reduce Energy Consumption in Homes and Offices.” Washington, DC: Environmental
and Energy Study Institute.
———. 2006b. “Industrial Energy Efficiency: Using New Technologies to Reduce Energy Use in Industry
and Manufacturing.” Washington, DC: Environmental and Energy Study Institute.
Granade, Hannah Choi, Jon Creyts, Anton Derkach, Philip Farese, Scott Nyquist, and Ken Ostrowski. 2009.
Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy . Executive summary, July. Atlanta, GA: McKinsey
and Company.