Database Reference
In-Depth Information
Model Summary
Algorithm
TwoStep
Input Features
8
Clusters
8
Cluster Quality
Poor
Fair
Good
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Silhouette measure of cohesion and separation
Figure 6.3 The overall silhouette measure of the clustering solution for credit
card holders.
Table 6.6 Distribution of the derived clusters.
Percentage of credit card holders
Clusters
Cluster 1
21.3
Cluster 2
10.0
Cluster 3
11.4
Cluster 4
9.1
Cluster 5
10.0
Cluster 6
25.4
Cluster 7
5.0
Cluster 8
7.7
Total
100.0
increased spending, while negative values denote scores below the average and
lower spending. In this particular example, though, we have to bear in mind
that negative scores in components 3, 4, and 5 represent increased spending for
appliances, telecommunication, and health services respectively, due to the high
negative loadings of the original inputs with those components.
Additionally, the clusters were profiled in terms of the original purchase fields.
The two affinity tables that follow, Tables 6.7 and 6.8, summarize the percentage
and the absolute purchase amount of each cluster by merchant type.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search