Geology Reference
In-Depth Information
groundwater flow or solute transport model, must be reasonably accurate, as
demonstrated during the model calibration process. However, because even
a well-calibrated model is based on insufficient data or oversimplifications,
there are errors and uncertainties in a groundwater-flow analysis or solute
transport analysis that make any model prediction no better than an
approximation. For this reason, all model predictions should be expressed as
a range of possible outcomes, which reflect the uncertainty in model parameter
values.
REFERENCES
Anderson, M.P. and Woessner, W.W., 1992. Applied Groundwater Modelling.
Academic Press, New York.
Bear, J., 1979. Hydraulics of Groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New York. 576 pp.
Bear, J., Beljin, M.S. and Ross, R.R., (1992). Fundamentals of Groundwater
Modelling. U.S. EPA.
Crank, J. and Nicolson, P. (1947). A Practical Method for Numerical Evaluation of
Solutions of Partial Differential Equations of the Heat Conduction type. Proc.
Camb. Phill. Soc.,
43:
50-67.
De Marsily, G. 1986. Quantitative Hydrogeology—Groundwater Hydrology for
Engineers. Academic Press, inc., Paris.
Elango, L., 2005. Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport.
Allied Publishers, Chennai.
Fetter, C.W., 1992. Applied Hydrogeology. Prentice Hall.
Richardson, L.F. 1910. The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differ-
ences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, with an Applica-
tion to the Stresses in a Masonry Dam.
Phil Trans. Royal Soc
.
A 210:
307-357.
Rai, S.N., 2004. Role of Mathematical Modeling in Groundwater Resources
Management. Sri Vinayaka Enterprises, Hyderabad
Richtmeyer, R.D. and Morton, K.W., 1967. Difference Methods for Initial Value
Problems. New York, Interscience.
Todd, D.K., 1980. Groundwater Hydrology, second edition. John Wiley and Sons,
New York. 535 pp.
