Geology Reference
In-Depth Information
Sl.
Sigma
Sigma(
)
K
> S
C
For total
Deleted
Data
No.
(
)
Bar
nodes of
Well No.
Points
227
25
3
5.14
1910
197
IFW-16,17
54
26
3
5.06
1790
197
IFW-16,18
54
27
3
5.11
1880
197
IFW-17,18
54
28
3
5.04
1780
195
IFW-19
55
29
3
5.05
1780
195
IFW-21
55
30
3
5.05
1790
195
IFW-22
55
31
3
5.06
1790
196
IFW-19,21
54
32
3
5.05
1790
195
IFW-19,22
54
33
3
5.07
1800
195
IFW-21,22
54
34
3
5.06
1800
196
IFW-7
55
35
3
5.08
1860
197
IFW-8
55
36
3
5.16
1980
197
IFW-7,8
54
37
3
5.09
1840
196
IFW-23
55
38
3
5.05
1790
195
IFW-24
55
39
3
5.04
1780
196
IFW-25
55
40
3
5.07
1800
197
IFW-24,25
54
41
3
5.07
1800
196
IFW-28
55
42
3
5.06
1790
195
IFW-29
55
43
3
5.12
1850
196
IFW-28,29
54
44
3
5.07
1800
196
IFW-27
55
45
3
5.04
1780
196
IFW-14
55
46
3
5.08
1810
197
IFW-27,14
54
47
3
5.07
1810
197
IFW-26
55
48
3
5.10
1860
196
IFW-30
55
49
3
5.03
1780
196
IFW-15
55
50
3
5.08
1800
198
IFW-4,5,6
53
51
3
5.08
1810
197
IFW-14,28
54
It was therefore proposed that a systematic redesign of the network of 40
wells be undertaken in order to examine its adequacy for monitoring the
wells within the watershed. This was achieved by optimizing the information
gained from each observation well and modifying by decreasing the number
of observation wells in order to upgrade the accuracy of the estimates.
MONITORING OF WELLS IN THE STUDY AREA
Water level monitoring was started during January 2000 from 31 wells; later
25 wells were also monitored for analyzing the water level variability in the
fractured rock aquifer (Fig.1). These wells were monitored manually in the
first week during each month. The water level measurements also tell us
about the extent of exploitation of groundwater in a watershed. The water
level decreases consistently in the watershed. In all 56 wells were monitored
