Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
compromised nodes increases in order to overcome the routing hole problem. Figure 6
shows the comparison of BIOSARP with SRTLD in terms on energy consumption.
WSN simulator consists of 121 nodes are distributed in 80m x 80m region. Nodes
numbered as 120, 110, 100 and 90 are the source nodes, node 0 is the sink node and
29, 25, 31 and 36 are adversary nodes.
0.3
0.2
0.1
BIOSARP
0
4
8
12
16
20
Number of Malicious Nodes
Fig. 5. Influence of increasing compromised nodes in network performance in terms of power
consumption
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
BIOSARP
SRTLD
0
200
225
250
275
300
Simulation Time (Sec)
Fig. 6. Performance Comparisons between BIOSARP and SRTLD in Terms of Energy
Consumption against Simulation Time
5 Conclusion
A biological inspired secure autonomous routing protocol is proposed named as
BIOSARP for WSNs. The article elaborates the security process of finding the
abnormality based on AIS. BIOSARP consumes 6% less energy as compared to
SAID. In simulation BIOSARP consumes 48% less power than SRTLD. The result
shows that BIOSARP outperforms SRTLD due to the several reasons. First is
BIOSARP provides preventive measure using AIS that can detect abnormalities
before real attacks happen. Thus additional attacks including, acknowledgement
spoofing attack, altered attack, replayed routing information attack and sybil attack
Search WWH ::




Custom Search