Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
the tuples and make consistent filtering to them. Those filtered here are denoted
by W.
According to DERIV(
Y,V
):
(I 4 ,I 5 )
C
(I 8 ,I 5 )
W
(I 4 ,I 6 )
C
(I 8 ,I 6 )
(I 4 ,I 7 )
(I 8 ,I 7 )
C
(I 4 ,I 9 )
W
(I 8 ,I 9 )
C
According to DERIV( V,A ):
(I 5 ,I 1 )
C
(I 7 ,I 1 )
(I 6 ,I 1 )
(I 9 ,I 1 )
C
Among that, in tuple(I 4 ,I 5 ), I 4 makes the qualitative state of Y transit to
<(0, ¯ ),inc>, while I 5 makes the qualitative state of V transit to <0,std>, which is
not consistent with constraint(Y,V). So (I 4 ,I 5 ) is filtered out. The I 9 in tuple (I 4 ,I 9 )
and (I 9 ,I 1 ) are both the transitions to V . As (I 9 ,I 1 ) has already been filtered out,
(I 4 ,I 9 ) is also filtered out.
The left tuples have formed two global explanations as following:
Y V A
I 4 I 7 I 1
I 8 I 6 I 1
The first explanation has no transition and is filtered out. The second
explanation is the only subsequent state. Now:
QS(
A,t 1 )<
g
, std>
QS(
V,t 1 )<0,dec>
Y max ,std>
Among that, Y max is the new landmark value.
QS(
Y,t 1 )<
4.6 Algebra Approach
Williams has built a mixed algebra combined qualitative with quantitative and
realized the corresponding symbol algebra program MINIMA, which is the
qualitative simulation of MACSYMAproviding a tool for simplifying,
decomposing and combining qualitative equations(Williams, 1988). The design
of one kind of physical problems can be handled by this algebra system.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search