Single-Trial Analysis of Bioelectromagnetic Signals: The Quest for Hidden Information - Modeling in Computational Biology and Biomedicine - page 249

PCA Principal Component Analysis

P300 P300 wave, a positive deflection of the electroencephalogram occuring

300 ms after a stimulus

SNR Signal to Noise Ratio

References

1. S. Baillet, J.C. Mosher, and R.M. Leahy. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal
Processing Magazine , 18(6):14-30, 2001.
2. M. Belkin and P. Niyogi. Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data
Representation. Neural Computation , 15:1373-1396, 2003.
3. C.G. Benar, T. Papadopoulo, B. Torresani, and M. Clerc. Consensus matching pursuit for multi-
trial eeg signals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 180:161-170, 2009.
4. C.G. Benar, D. Sch on, S. Grimault, B. Nazarian, B. Burle, M. Roth, J.M. Badier, P. Marquis,
C. Liegeois-Chauvel, and J.L. Anton. Single-trial analysis of oddball event-related potentials
in simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Human Brain Mapping , 28:602-613, 2007.
5. B. Burle, C. Roger, S. Allain, F. Vidal, and T. Hasbroucq. Error negativity does not reflect
conflict: a reappraisal of conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex activity. J. of Cogn.
Neurosci. , 20(9):1637-55, 2008.
6. P. Comon. Independent component analysis - a new concept? Signal Processing , 36, 1994.
7. J. de Munck, F. Bijma, P. Gaura, C. Sieluzycki, M. Branco, and R. Heethaar. A maximum-
likelihood estimator for trial-to-trial variations in noisy MEG/EEG data sets. IEEE Trans.
Biomed. Eng. , 51(12):2123-28, 2004.
8. S. Debener, M. Ullsperger, M. Siegel, K. Fiehler, D. von Cramon, and A. Engel. Trial-by-
trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging
identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Neuroscience , 2005.
9. T. Eichele, K. Specht, M. Moosmann, M. Jongsma, R. Quian Quiroga, H. Nordby, and
K. Hugdahl. Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial
event-related potentials and functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. , 2005.
10. A. Gramfort, R. Keriven, and M. Clerc. Graph-based variability estimation in single-trial event-
related neural responses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin. , 56(5):1051-1061, 2010.
11. R. Gribonval, H. Rauhut, K. Schnass, and P. Vandergheynst. Atoms of all channels, unite!
Average case analysis of multi-channel sparse recovery using greedy algorithms. The Journal
of Fourier Analysis and Applications , 14(5):655-687, 2008.
12. M. Hein, J. Audibert, and U. von Luxburg. Graph Laplacians and their convergence on random
neighborhood graphs. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 8:1325-1370, 2007.
13. A. Holm, P. Ranta-aho, M. Sallinen, P. Karjalainen, and K. M uller. Relationship of P300 single-
trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence. Int. J. Psychophysiol. ,
2006.
14. T.P. Jung, S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, J. Townsend, E. Courchesne, and T.J. Sejnowski.
Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Human Brain Mapping ,
14:166-185, 2001.
15. M. Kutas, G. McCarthy, and E. Donchin. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a
measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science , 197:792-795, August 1977.
16. D. Lehmann and W. Skrandies. Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man - a review. Progr
Neurobiol , 23(3):227-250, 1984.
17. S. Mallat and Z. Zhang. Matching pursuit with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. on
Signal Processing , 41(12):3397-3414, 1993.