Belief, Inquiry, Argument and Reflection as Significant Issues in Learning about Information Systems Development Methodologies - Current Issues in IT Education - page 11

REFERENCES
Avison, D. E., & Fitzgerald, G. (1995). Information Systems Development: Methodologies,
Techniques and Tools . London: McGraw-Hill.
Banks, D. A. (1999). Who Needs Methodologies? A Case Study of the Development of a
Web-based Information System. In B. Hope & P. Yoong (Eds.), 10th Australasian
Conference on Information Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 42-53). New Zealand: Victoria Univer-
sity of Wellington.
Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice . Brisbane: John Wiley.
Checkland, P. B. (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice . Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think . New York: D C Heath and Co.
Espejo, R. & Harnden, R. (1989). The Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications
of Stafford Beer's VSM . Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
Flood, R. L. (1995). Solving Problem Solving: A Potent Force for Effective Management .
Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development.
Communications of the ACM, 32, 10(10).
Locke, J. (1706). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding . Abridged by J. W. Yolton
(1976), London, UK: J. M. Dent and Sons.
Sauer, C. (1993). Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach . Henley-on-Thames,
UK: Alfred Waller.
Toulmin, S. E. (1999). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wastell, D. G. (1996). The fetish of technique: methodology as a social defence. Information
Systems Journal, 6 , 25-40.
Woozley, A. D. (1967). Theory of Knowledge. London, UK: Hutchinson University Library.