Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
I sc =2 I c0 cos φ 1 ( t )+ φ 2 ( t )
2
sin φ 1 ( t )
φ 2 ( t )
,
(3.27)
2
where the second term on the right-hand side of (3.27), which is the contri-
bution of quasi-particles, is neglected for simplicity.
Considering the flux quantization condition,
φ 1 ( t )
φ 2 ( t )
= −π Φ t ( t )
Φ 0
(3.28)
2
is true. Substituting (3.28) into (3.26),
I b =2 I c0 sin [ φ ( t )] cos π Φ t ( t )
Φ 0
+ 2 V ( t )
R s
(3.29)
is derived. Since the flux caused by the screening current Φ sc is written as
Φ s = L sq I sc ,
(3.30)
the following equation is yielded by rearranging (3.19), (3.26), and (3.28):
= β L sin π Φ t ( t )
Φ 0
cos [ φ ( t )] ,
Φ ex
Φ t
(3.31)
Φ 0
where 2 L 0 is replaced by L sq , and the parameter
β L = 2 I c0 L sq
Φ 0
(3.32)
is introduced. If the screening current I sc is neglected, Φ t ( t )
Φ ex ( t ) because
β L −→
0. Equation (3.29) is simplified as
2
R s
h
4 πe
d φ ( t )
d t
I b = I c ( Φ ex )sin[ φ ( t )] +
,
(3.33)
where
I c ( Φ ex )=cos π Φ ex
Φ 0
.
(3.34)
The I - V characteristics of SQUIDs are obtained by solving these nonli-
near equations with changing I b for a constant flux. The Φ - V characteristics
are also obtained with changing Φ for a constant I b . However, a simple ap-
proximation has been proposed for the detailed analysis, as follows:
0
≥|
I b |≥
I c ( Φ ex )
V ( t )=0 ,
(3.35)
I b
V ( t )= R s
2
|
I b |≥
I c ( Φ ex )
[ I c ( Φ ex )] 2 .
(3.36)
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search