Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
The greatest draw ratio l
max
of polymer can be estimated according to
the Eq. (5.8). In Fig. 5.6, the comparison of l
max
and l
ZD
is adduced, from
The reasons of this discrepancy are obvious - strictly speaking, the Eq. (5.8)
is valid for rubbers only (
D
ch
= 2.0) and does not take into consideration ste-
ric hindrances, induced
D
ch
reduction in glassy state, that is, availability of
“frozen” local order (clusters). These hindrances can be taken into account
by a simple semiempirical mode: in glassy state corrected value l
max
(l
fr
) is
equal to [28]:
D
2
ll
=
ch
(5.11)
fr
max
Since for rubbers
D
ch
= 2.0, then for them the Eq. (5.11) gives trivial
identity. The comparison of calculated by the indicated mode values l
fr
and
l
ZD
, adduced in Fig. 5.6, shows their good correspondence.
Thus, the stated above results demonstrated the fractal analysis possibili-
ties at polymers local deformation description. In each from the described
cases fractal dimension of either element has simple and clear physical sig-
nificance that allows to obtain both empirical and analytic correlations be-
tween different structural levels in polymers and also describe their evolu-
tion in polymers deformation and failure processes.
FIGURE 5.6
The relation between draw ratios l
ZD
and l
max
(1), l
ZD
and l
fr
(2) for PASF
[28].
At local plasticity zones formation near defect, in particular, a notch,
polymer volume, which is in yielding state, is surrounded by elastically de-
formed material. This results to local yield stress-enhancement and the given