Database Reference
In-Depth Information
8.6.7
Persuade
CLASS INFINITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS
1. nominal object:
*John persuaded Mary a cookie.
2. one-place infinitive object:
John persuaded Mary to sleep.
. . .
(as in 8.5.1)
Object control means that it is the object Mary who sleeps, in contrast to the
examples in 8.5.1, in which it is the subject John.
While
Mary
is the indirect object in 8.6.5, it is the direct object in 8.6.7. This
leaves the second
arg
position in the matrix verb to the infinitive.
24
8.6.8 D
EFINITION OF
persuade
CLASS INFINITIVES
noun:
δ
fnc:
α
⎡
⎣
⎤
⎦
verb:
α
arg:
γβδ
verb:
β
fnc:
α
arg:
δ
X
Mary to sleep persuade
(examples of matching contents, for illustration only)
where
α
{advise, allow, appoint, ask, beg, choose, convince, encourage, expect, forbid, force, invite,
need, permit, persuade, select, teach, tell, urge, want, would like}.
Selectional constellations
:[omitted]
As shown by the respective restrictions on the variable
, the number of verbs
in the
persuade
class is substantially higher than that in the
promise
class
(8.6.6).
25
The schema matches the elementary signatures N
α
\
V (indirect object) and
V (infinitive). The first noun pattern matches the direct object, e.g.,
Mary
.
Its core value, represented by
\
V
δ
, appears in the third
arg
slot of the matrix verb
α
, thus coding object control.
In conclusion let us compare the DBS graph analysis of a
persuade
and a
promise
class infinitive content construction:
and in the first
arg
slot of the infinitive
β
8.6.9 O
BJECTCONTROLIN
John persuaded Mary to read a book.
(i) semantic relations graph (SRG)
(iii) numbered arcs graph (NAG)
persuade
persuade
8
5
4
3
1
read
read
6
7
2
John
book
Mary
John
book
Mary
24
Given that
persuade
class constructions do not allow replacing the infinitive by a nominal object, it
does not necessarily follow that the infinitive in a
persuade
class construction must function as the
indirect object of the matrix verb. In German, for example, there are three-place verbs like
lehren
(teach) which take two objects in the accusative (which would correspond to two direct objects in
English).
25
Comrie's (1986) claim that subject and object control are also determined by pragmatic factors may
be accommodated by non-disjunct restriction sets on the variable
α
in various class definitions.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search