Database Reference
In-Depth Information
The SRG and the signature in 7.3.5 are each homomorph to the proplet graph
7.3.4. The direction of the homomorphism from SRGs and signatures to pro-
plet graphs is necessitated by the more differentiated structure of proplets as
compared to the corresponding nodes in SRGs or signatures.
A pair of directly connected nodes in a signature constitutes an elementary
signature . In running text, elementary signatures are written as two nodes with
a line in between, e.g., N
V. There are the following seven elementary signa-
tures in DBS which are (i) intrapropositional and (ii) transparent: 13
/
7.3.6 T HE SEVEN TRANSPARENT SEMANTIC RELATIONS OF STRUCTURE
subject-verb:
1. N
/
V
object-verb:
2. N
\
V
adjective-noun:
3. A
|
N
adjective-verb:
4. A
|
V
conjunct-conjunct:
5. N
N
6. V
V
A
For example, the signature in 7.3.5 is based on the elementary signatures N
7. A
/
V
\
|
(subject-verb), N
N (adnominal-noun).
It holds in general that the order of the letters in an elementary signature like
V (object-verb), and A
N
V does not indicate any primacy of one part of speech over the other. For
now (cf. Sect. 7.6), let us motivate the letter order graphically: in the case of
elementary “
/
” signatures, the first node is shown lower than the
second node in the graph (7.3.4), while in elementary “
/
,” “
\
,” and “
|
” signatures the first
node is shown to the left of the second node in the graph (7.4.4).
7.4 Producing Natural Language Surfaces from Content
For natural language production from content, the (i) SRG and the (ii) signa-
ture are complemented by two additional structures, called the (iii) numbered
arcs graph or NAG 14 and the (iv) surface realization . Together, these concep-
tual structures provide four simultaneous views (in the conceptual sense) on
a given content. This is illustrated next with the graphical representation of
the content corresponding to the English surface The little girl ate an apple. ,
familiar from 7.2.3, 7.3.2, 7.3.4 and 7.3.5:
13 For the inverse constructions, i.e., (i) extrapropositional and (ii) opaque signatures, see Sect. 7.5.
14 For graph-theoretical and linguistic constraints on NAGs, see Sect. 9.1.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search