Database Reference
In-Depth Information
Algorithm 4 Input: n objects G 1 ,...,G n , where each G i describes the following data:
(1) a tuple t i
(2) an unknown probability p i
(3) a lower bound L i
and an upper bound U i
such that p i ∈[ L i ,U i ]
.
Output: The set Top k .
1: while true do
2:
L c
max k (L 1 ,...,L n )U c
=
=
max k (U 1 ,...,U n )
B k ={ t i | U i L c
} T k ={ t i | U c
L i }
3:
if U c
L c
then
4:
return Top k = T k
5:
end if
6:
such that L i <L c , U c <U i
[ L i ,U i ]
if exists
then
7:
G i is a double crosser : simulate G i one step.
8:
end if
9:
such that L i <L c <U c
= L c <U c <U j then
if exists
[ L i ,U i ]
,
[ L j ,U j ]
= U i , L j
10:
G i ,G j are lower/upper crossers : simulate both G i ,G j one step.
11:
end if
12:
such that L i L c , U c
Choose a maximal crosser
[ L i ,U i ]
U i .
13:
Simulate G i
one step.
14:
15: end while
the condition L i <L c continues to hold after any number of simulation steps; hence, we always
have t i T k . By the same argument t i B k .By 6.2 , when the critical region becomes empty, then
B k
T k =[
B k nor
T k contains t i . Consider now case
n
]
, but this contradicts the fact that neither
2, and let L i <L c <U c
= U i and L j = L c <U c <U j be a lower and upper crosser, respectively.
Then t i T k and t j B k . Consider any sequence of simulations that does not touch the tuples
t i or t j but causes the critical region to become empty. That sequence must either decrease U c ,
causing t i B k , or it must increase L c , causing t j
T k , both contradicting the fact that, when
B k T k =[ n ]
the critical region becomes empty,
. Finally, for case 3, assume there are only upper
crossers, and that L i = L c <U c
U i is a maximal upper crosser; then t i B k . Assume a sequence
of simulations that do not touch the tuple t i : it will continue to hold that t i B k ; hence, when the
algorithm terminates, it must be the case that, upon termination, t i T k : this means that L c will
remain unchanged during these simulations, implying that T k also remains unchanged during these
additional simulation steps. That means that at the time the algorithm inspected the crosser t i
we
| T k |=
had
k , contradicting the fact that the critical region is non-empty.
Finally, we consider the case when some probabilities are equal, p i = p j . If the set Top k is
uniquely defined, then one can show that the algorithm works unchanged. However, if the ties
between probabilities cause Top k
to be ill-defined, then the algorithm will never terminate, and the
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search