Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
(a) Ground truth
(b) Belief propagation
(c) Graph cuts
(f) Hybrid camera system
(d) Dynamic programming
(e) Scanline optimization
Fig. 10
Results of depth estimation for BEAR image
Table 3
ROI depth quality evaluation
Methods
R
E
B
A
B
Diff
Belief gropagation
26.5
50.1%
+11.2%
Graph cuts
62.1
83.3%
+44.4%
Dyanaimc programimg
46.1
76.7%
+37.8%
Scanline optimization
67.7
79.5%
+40.6%
Hybrid camera system
24.4
38.9%
-
(a) Ground truth
(b) Dynamic programming
(c) Belief propagation
(d) Hybrid camera system
Fig. 11
3D scene reconstruction on ROI of BEAR images
