Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
[484] Thalleim T, Vollmer A, Ebert Ru, Kuhne R, Schuurmann G. Tautomer identification and
tautomer structure generation based on the InChl Code. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010,
50:1223-1232.
[485] ten Brink T, Exner TE. Influence of protonation, tautomeric and stereoisomeric states on
protein-ligand docking results. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49: 1535-1546.
[486] Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational
approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development
settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46:3-26.
[487] Stouch TR, The errors of our ways: taking account of error in computer-aided drug design
to build confidence intervals for our next 25 years, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2012,
26:125-134.
[488] Carlson HA, Dunbar JB. A call to arms: what you can do for computational drug discovery.
J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2011, 51:2025-2026.
[489] Guthrie JP. A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and
overview. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113:4501-4507.
[490] Muchmore SW, Debe DA, Metz JT, Brown SP, Martin YC, Hajduk PJ, 2008. Application
ofbelief theory to similarity data fusion for use in analog searching and lead hopping. J.
Chem. Inf. Mode. 2008, 48: 941-948.
[491] Tejwani RW, Davis ME, Anderson BD, Stouch TR, An atomic and molecular view of the
depth dependence of the free energies of solute transfer from water into lipid bilayers.
2011, Mol. Phar, 2011, 8: 2204-2215.
[492] Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, Repasky MP, Knoll
EH, Shaw DE,Shelley M, Perry JK, Francis P, Shenkin PS, "Glide: A New Approach for
Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy",
J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749.
[493] Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic
algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol, 1995, 245:43-53.
[494] Venkatachalam CM, Jian X, Oldfield T, Waldman MJ, LigandFit: a novel method for the
shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. Mol. Graph Model 2003, 21:
289-307.
[495] Ravitz O, Zsoldos Z, Simon A, Improving molecular docking through eHITS turntable
scoring functiron, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Design, 2011, 25:1033-1051.
[496] Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T and Klebe GA, A fast flexible docking method using
incremental construction algorithm, J. Mol. Biology, 1996, 261:470-489.
[497] Gann M, FRED Pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy, Chemical Information and
Modeling, 2011, 51:578-596.
[498] McGann M, FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized dataset, J. Comput
Aided Mol. Des., 2012, 26: 897-906.
[499] Splitzer R, Jain AN, Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application, J.
Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 26: 687-699.
[500] Dakshanamurthy S, Issa NT, Assefnia S, Seshasayee A, Peters OJ, Madhavan S, Uren A,
Brown ML and Byers SW. Predicting new indications for approved drugs using a
proteochemometric method, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, 55:6832-6848.
[501] Klenner A, Weisel M, Reisen F, Proschak E and Schneider G, Automated docking of
flexible molecules into receptor binding sites by ligand self-organizaion
in situ
, Mol Info,
2010, 29:189-193.
[502] Hubbard RE, Davis B, Chen I and Drysdale MJ, The SeeDs approach: Integrating
fragments into drug discovery, Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2007, 7:1568-1581.
