Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
[387] Brooijmans N and Kuntz ID. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annual
Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure.2003, 32: 335-373.
[388] Ebalunoide JO, Ouyang Z, Liang J, Zheng W. Novel approach to structure-based
pharmacophore search using computational geometry and shape matching techniques. J.
Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48: 889-901.
[389] Brown N, Jacoby E. On scaffolds and hopping in medicinal chemistry. Mini Rev. Med.
Chem. 2006, 6: 1217-1219.
[390] Proschak E, Rupp M, Derksen S, Schneider G, Shapelets: Possibilities and limitation of
shape-based virtual screening. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29: 108-114.
[391] Vainio MJ, Puranen JS, Johnson MS. ShaEP: molecular overlay based on shape and
electrostatic potential. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49: 492-502.
[392] Grant JA, Gallardo MA, Pickup BT, A fast method of molecular shape comparison: a
simple application of the Gaussian description of molecular shape. J. Comput. Chem. 1996,
17: 1653-1660.
[393] Rush TS, Grant JA, Morsysk L, Nicholls A. A shape-based 3-D scaffold hoppin method
and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1489-
1495.
[394] Mavridis L, Hudson BD, Richie DW. Toward high throughput 3D virtual screening using
spherical harmonic surface representations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47: 1787-1796.
[395] Cai W, Shao X, Maigret B. Protein-ligand recognition using spherical harmonic molecular
surfaces: towards a fast and efficient filter for large virtual throughput screening. J. Mol.
Graph. Model. 2002, 20: 313-328.
[396] Ritchie DW, Kemp GJL. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations
Proteins. 2000, 39: 178-194.
[397] Henrich S, Salo-Ahen OMH, Huang B, Rippmann FF, Cruciani G, Wade RC.
Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding site for ligand
design J. Mol. Recognit. 2010, 23: 209-219.
[398] Gold ND, Jackson RM, SitesBase: a database for structure-based protein-ligand binding
site comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D231-D234.
[399] Yang L, Chen J, Shi L, Hudock MP, Wang K, He L. Identifying unexpected therapeutic
target via chemical-protein interactions. PLoSOne, 2010,5: 9568-9571.
[400] Kirkpatrick P, Ellis C, Chemical space. Nature, 2004, 432:823-823
[401] Lipkus AH, Yuan Q, Lucas KA, Funk SA, Bartlett III WF, Schenck RJ, Trippe AJ.
Structural diversity of organic chemistry. A scaffold analysis of the CAS registry, J. Org.
Chem 2008, 73: 443-445.
[402] Sanderson CM, The cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein
interaction networks. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, 2009, 8: 1-11.
[403] Ritchie DW, Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Curr Protein
Pept Sci, 2008, 9: 1-15.
[404] Kastritis PL, Bonvin AM (2010) Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to
predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. J Proteome Res,
2010, 9: 2216-25.
[405] Andrusier N, Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ, Principles of flexible protein-protein
docking. Proteins, 2008, 73: 271-89.
[406] Bernauer J, Bahadur RP, Rodier F, Janin J, Poupon A. DiMoVo: A Voronoi tessellation
based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein
interactions. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24: 652-658.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search