Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 5.2 Overview, and examples, of the main methodologies utilized for the assessment of the gut microbiota of fish.
Method
Advantages
Disadvantages
References
Gut microbiota
Probiotic study
Culture-dependent
Culturing on general media
followed by biochemical
characteristics
Easy, inexpensive,
quantitative
Culture-dependent, large number of
isolates required to provide meaningful
data, time consuming, metabolic
plasticity of organisms may introduce
error
Al-Harbi and Uddin (2003;
2004; 2005)
Bagheri et al .
(2008)
Culturing on selective
media
Easy, inexpensive,
quantitative
Culture-dependent, selectivity of media is
not guaranteed
Carnevali et al . (2006),
Rollo et al . (2006), Silvi
et al . (2008), Ghosh
et al . (2010)
Zhou et al . (2007),
Lv et al . (2007),
Ghosh et al .
(2008)
Culturing on general media
followed by 16S rRNA
sequence analysis of
isolates
Confidence of species level
identification of isolates,
quantitative
Culture-dependent, large number of
isolates required to provide meaningful
data, time consuming
Ringø et al. (2006a;
2006b; 2008),
Merrifield et al . (2009a)
Aubin et al .
(2005)
Culturing on media
followed by random
amplified polymorphic
DNA (RAPD) analysis of
isolates
Easy, inexpensive,
quantitative
Culture-dependent, large number of
isolates required to provide meaningful
data, time consuming, low
reproducibility, phylogenetic
information only available with
comparison to RAPD profiles of known
cultures
NR
Balcázar et al .
(2007a; 2007b;
2009), Vendrell
et al . (2008)
(continued overleaf )
Search WWH ::




Custom Search