Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 15
Main results for various climatic zones—case A
Location
EP
H. env
EP
H
[kWh/
(m
2
year)]
EP
gl
Class
EP
H. env
EP
H
[kWh/
(m
2
year)]
EP
gl
Class
Combination 1—Envelope refurbishment
BEST
WORST
Lampedusa
11.29
28.47
53.22
D
17.13
39.66
64.37
E
Palermo
13.89
34.06
58.69
D
22.08
49.38
73.97
E
Napoli
16.72
39.81
64.33
C
26.98
58.44
82.91
D
Roma
25.76
57.52
81.83
C
44.44
89.95
114.17
E
Milano
53.02
101.35
125.46
D
90.24
161.87
185.92
D
Bressanone
55.51
109.22
133.21
C
98.95
180.74
204.66
E
Combination 2—Heating system refurbishment
BEST
WORST
Lampedusa
67.97
72.2
93.97
F
67.97
74.59
98.16
F
Palermo
84.86
89.42
110.91
F
84.86
92.81
116.04
F
Napoli
100.91
105.55
126.76
F
100.91
110.17
133.07
F
Roma
155.98
157.91
178.42
F
155.98
168.71
191
F
Milano
280.41
275.74
295.73
G
280.41
302.44
324.36
G
Bressanone
314.53
308.98
328.66
F
314.53
338.99
360.55
G
Combination 3—Global refurbishment
BEST
WORST
Lampedusa
11.29
14.25
36.47
B
17.13
21.36
45.03
C
Palermo
13.89
17.33
39.38
B
22.08
27.03
50.37
C
Napoli
16.72
20.66
42.53
B
26.98
32.64
55.65
C
Roma
25.76
30.8
52.33
B
44.44
51.64
74.04
C
Milano
53.02
59.8
80.93
C
90.24
100.29
122.28
D
Bressanone
55.51
62.8
83.75
B
98.95
109.96
131.6
C
40%
36.4%
34.9%
35%
33.8%
32.5%
29.3%
30%
28.3%
23.6%
25%
22.4%
21.8%
20.7%
19.0%
20%
17.3%
15%
8.8%
8.8%
10%
6.6%
4.7%
4.4%
4.3%
5%
0%
Envelope
Heating system
Combination
Intervention
Lampedusa
Palermo
Napoli
Roma
Milano
Bressanone
Fig. 11
Global energy performance gap
