Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
[371] Irwin JJ. Community benchmarks for virtual screening. J. Comput Aided Mol. Des. 2008; 22:193-199.
[372] Hawkins PCD, Warren GL, Skillman AG,. How to do an evaluation:pitfalls and traps. J. Comput. AIDED Mol. Des.
2008;22:191-192.
[373] Alcaro S, Gasparrini F, Incani O, Mecucci S, Misiti D, Pierini M, Villani CA. `quase-flexible` automatic docking
processing for studying stereoselective recognition mechanisms. Part I. Protocol validation. J. Comput. Chem.
2000;21:515-530.
[374] Guner O, Clement O, Kurogi Y. Pharmacophore modeling and three dimensional database searching for drug design using
catalyst:recent advances. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004;11:2991-3005.
[375] corina. Version 1.82: Molecular Networks GmbH:Erlangen Germany, 1997.
[376] Maestro, version 7.5.116; Schrodinger. LLC: Portland QR, USA 2006.
[377] Shoichet BK, Bodian DL, Kuntz ID. Molecular docking using shape descriptors. J. Comput. Chem. 1992;13:380-397.
[378] Ewing TJA, Kuntz ID Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening J.
Comput. Chem 1997;18:1175-1189.
[379] Moustakas DT, Llang PT, Pegg S, Pettersen E, Kuntz ID, Brooijmans N, Rizzo RC. Development and validation of a
modular extensible docking program:DOCK 5. J. Comput. Aided Mol.. Des. 2006;20:601-619.
[380] Desjarlais RL, Sheridan RP, Seibel GL, Dixon JS, Kuntz ID, Venkatarahavan. Using shape complementarity as an initial
screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure. J. Med. Chem. 1988;31:722-
729.
[381] Norinder U, Bergstrom CAS, Prediction of ADMET properties. ChemMedChem 2006; 1:920-937
[382] Kirchmair J, Wolber C, Laggner C, Langer T. Comparative analysis of protein-bound ligand conformations with respect to
catalysts`s conformational space subsampling algorithms. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005;23:129-138.
[383] Boehm HJ. Ludi:rule-based atomatic design of new substituents for enzyme inhibitor leads. J. Comput-aided Mol. Des.
1992;6:593-606.
[384] Barreiro G, Kim JT, Guimaraes CRW, Bailey CM, Domaoal RA, Wang L, Anderson KS, Jorgensen WL. From docking
false-positive to active anti-HIV agent. J. Med. Chem. 2007; 50:5324-5329.
[385] Dixon SL, Smondyrev AM, Knoll EH, Rao SN, Shaw DE, Friesner RA. PHASE:a new engine for pharmcophore
perception, 3D QDSAR model development, and 3D database creening:1. Methodology and preliminary results. J.
Comput-Aided Mol. Des. 2006;20:647-71.
[386] Halgren TA, Murphy RB, Friesner RA, Beard HS, Frye LL, Pollard WT, Banks JL. Glide: A new approach for rapid
accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004;l47:1750-1759.
[387] Elridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP. Empirical scoring functions. 1. The development of a fast
empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des.
1997;11:425-445.
[388] Kurogi Y, Guner OF. Pharmacophore modeling and three dimensional database searching for drug design using catalyst.
Curr. Med. Chem. 8;2007; 3:187-197.
[389] Kirchmair S, Ristic K, Eder P, Markt G, Wolber C, Laggner T. Larger, fast and efficient i
n silico 3D screening:
toward
maximum computational efficiency of pharmacophore-biased and shape-based approaches. J. Chem. Inf. Model
2007;47:2182-2196.
[390] Proudfoot JR. The evolution of synthetic oral drug properties. Bioorg. MEed. Chem. Lett 2005; 1:920-937.
[391] Joseph-McCarthy D, Tomas BEIV, Belmarsh M, Moustakas D, Alvarez JC. Pharmacophore-based molecular docking to
account for ligand flexibility. PROTEINS: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2003;51:172-188.
[392] Joseph-McCarthy D, McFadyen IJ, ZOou J, Walker G, Alvarez JC. Pharmacophore-based molecular docking; A practical
guide. Drug Discovery Ser. 2005;1:327-347.
[393] Rush TS, Manas ES, Tawa GJ, Alvarez JC. Solvation-based scoring for high-throughpt docking. Drug Discovery Ser.
2005;1;249-277.
[394] Joseph-McCarthy D, Alvarez JC. Automated generation of MCSS-derived pharmacophoric DOCK site pints for searching
multiconformation databases. Proteins;Stuct. Funct. Genet. 2003; 51:189-202.
[395] Thompson DC, Hublet C, Joseph-McCarthy D. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses. J. Chem. Inf.
Model. 2008;48;1081-1091.
[396] Jain An Surflelc-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility and knowledge-based
seach. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007;21:281-306.
[397] Pham TA, Jain AN. Parameter Estimation for scoring protein-lignd interactions using negative training data. J. Med. Chem
2006;49:5856-5868.
[398] Verkhivker Gm, Bouzida D, Gehlhaar DK, Rejto PA, Arthurs S, Colson AB, Feer ST, Llarson V, Luty BA, Marone , Rose PW.
Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-proetin complexes. J. Compujt-Aidd Mol. Des. 2000;14:731-751.
