Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
[71] Mobley DL, Graves AP, Chodera JD, McReynolds AC, Stoichet BK and Dill KA. Predicting absolute ligand binding free
energies to a simple model site. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;371:1118-1134.
[72] Pearlman DA, Koffman PA. The lag between the Hamiltonian and the system configuration in fre energy perturbation
calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 1989;91:7831-7839.
[73] Lee MS, Salsbury FR, Brooks CL. Constant-pH molecular dynamics using continuous titration coordinates. Proteins
2004;56:738-752.
[74] Abrams JB, Rosso L, Tuckerman ME. Efficient and precise solvation free energies via alchemical adiabatic molecular
dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2006;125;74115-74127.
[75] Bitetti-Putzer, Dinner AR, Yang W, Karplus M. Conformational sampling via a self-regulating effective energy surface. J.
Chem. Phys. 2006;124:174901-174915.
[76] Pitera JW, Kollman PA. Exhaustive mutagenesis in silico:multicoordinate free energy calculations on proteins and
peptides. Proteins. 2000; 41;385-397.
[77] Cross JB, Thompson DC, Rai BK, Baber JC, Fan KY, Hu Y, Humblet C. Comparison of several molecular docking
programs: pose prediction and virtual screeing accuracy. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2009;49:1455-1474.
[78] Fukinishi H, Teramoto R, Takada TG and Shimada J. Bootstrap-based consensus scoring method for protein-ligand
docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008;48: 988-996.
[79] Stroganov OV, Novikov FN, Stroylov VS, Kulkov V and Chilov GG. Lead Finder: An approach to improve accuracy of
protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2008;48:2371-2385.
[80] Mladenovic M, Arnone M, Fink RF and Engels B. Environmental effects on charge densities of biologically active
molecules: Do molecule crystal environments indeed approximate protein surrounding. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009;113:5072-
5082.
[81 Harpsoe K, Liljefors T, Balle T. Prediction of the binding mode of biarylpropsylsufonamide allosteric AMPA receptor
modulators based on docking, GRID molecular interaction fields and 3D-QSAR analysis. Journal of Molecular Graphics
and Modelling 2008;26:874-883.
[82] Butler KT, Luque FJ and Barril X. Toward accurate relative energy predictions of the bioactive conformation of drugs. J.
Comput. Chem. 2009;30:601-610.
[83] Marcou G, Rognan D. Optimizing fragment and scaffold docking by use of molecular interaction fingerprints. J. Chem.
Inf. Model. 2007;47:195-207.
[84] Areej M, Hammad A and Taha MO. Pharmacophore modeling, quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis and
shape-complemented
in silico
screening allow access to novel influenza neuraminidase inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Model.
2009;49:978-996.
[85] Loving K, Salam NK and Woody Sherman. Energetic analysis of fragment docking and application to structure-based
pharmacophore hyphothesis generation. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2009;23:541-554.
[86] Chaudhaery SS, Roy KK and Saxena AK. Consensus superiority of the pharmacophore-based alignment over maximum
common substructure (MCS): 3D-QSAR studies on carbamates as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Model.
2009;49:1590-1601.
[87] Du qs, Huang RB, Wel YT, Pang ZW, Du LQ and Chou KC. Fragment-based quantitative structure-activity relationship
(FB-QSAR) for fragment-based drug design. J. Comput Chem. 2009;30:295-304
[88] Hert J, Keiser MJ, Irwin JJ, Oprea TI and Shoichet BK. Quantifying the relationships among drug classes. J. Chem. Inf.
Model. 2008;48:755-765.
89] Rastelli G, Degliesposti G, Del Rio A and Sgobba M, Binding estimation after refinement, a new automated procedure for
the refinement and rescoring of docked ligands in virtual screening. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009;73:283-286.
[90] Roberts BC and Mancera RL. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008;48:397-408.
[91] Illingworth CJR, Morris GM, Parkers KEB, Snell CR and Reynolds CA. Assessing the role of polarization in docking. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2008;112:12157-12163.
[92] Vajda S and Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Current opinion in
structural biology 2009;19:164-70.
[93] Moffat K, Gillet VJ, Whittle M, Bravi G, Leach ARA. Comparison of field-based similarity searching methods:CatShape,
FBSS and ROCS. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008; 48:719-729.
[94] Huang Z, Wong CF and Wheeler RA. Flexible protein-flexible ligand docking with disrupted velocity simulated
annealing. Proteins 2008;71:440-454.
[95]
Seifert MH. Robust optimization of scoring functions for a target class. J. Comput Aided Mol. Des. 2009;23:633-644.
[96]
Thompson DC, Denny A, Nilakantan R, Humblet C, McCarthy DJ and Feyfant E. CONFIRM:connecting fragments found
in receptor molecules. J. Comput Aided Mol. Des. 2008; 22:761-772.
