Database Reference
In-Depth Information
card -minimal repair for D w.r.t.
rep-
resents minimum number of the ground weak constraints which are not satisfied by
any preferred repair.
AC
, whereas the value
ω∈W ∧θ∈Θ ( ω ) s
[ μ ω,θ ]
Example 4.6. The optimization problem OPT
( D,AC,W ,
D
)
obtained for “Bal-
ance Sheet” example, where
AC = 1
}
and
W =
}
is shown in
2
3
1
2
Fig. 4.2. Herein, the substitutions
θ 1
,...,θ
4 are such that:
20
i = 1 5
min
(
· δ i + μ ω 1 1 + μ ω 1 2 + μ ω 2 3 + μ ω 2 4 )
z 2 +
z 3 =
z 4
w 16 =
z 16
40
z 5 +
z 6 +
z 7 =
z 8
w 17 =
z 17
20
z 12 +
z 13 =
z 14
w 18 =
z 18
1120
z 15 +
z 16 +
z 17 =
z 18
w 19 =
z 19
10
z 4
z 8 =
z 9
w 20 =
z 20
90
z 14
z 18
=
z 19
w i
M
δ
0
i
[
1
..
20
]
i
z 1
z 9
=
z 10
w i
M
δ
0
i
[
1
..
20
]
i
z 11
z 19
=
z 20
z i
M
0
i
[
1
..
20
]
w 1
=
z 1
50
z i
M
0
i
[
1
..
20
]
w 2
=
z 2
900
z i
,
w i
Z
i
[
1
..
20
]
w 3
=
z 3
100
δ
∈{
0
,
1
}∀
i
[
1
..
20
]
i
w 4
=
z 4
1250
σ ω 1 1 =
z 2
1000
w 5
=
z 5
1120
σ ω 1 2 =
z 12
1000
w 6
=
z 6
20
σ ω 2 3 =
200
z 3
w 7
=
z 7
80
σ ω 2 4 =
200
z 13
w 8
1220
w 9 = z 9 30
w 10 = z 10 80
w 11 = z 11 80
w 12 = z 12 1110
w 13 = z 13 90
w 14 = z 14 1200
w 15 = z 15 1130
=
z 8
· μ ω 1 1 ≤ σ ω 1 1
−M· μ ω 1 2 ≤ σ ω 1 2
−M· μ ω 2 3 ≤ σ ω 2 3
−M· μ ω 2 4 ≤ σ ω 2 4
μ ω 1 1 ∈{ 0 , 1 }
μ ω 1 2 ∈{ 0 , 1 }
μ ω 2 3 ∈{ 0 , 1 }
μ ω 2 4 ∈{ 0 , 1 }
M
Fig. 4.2 Instance of OPT
( D,AC,W ,
D
)
obtained for “Balance Sheet” example
θ
( ω
)=
BalanceSheets
(
2008
,
Receipts
,
cash sales
,
det
,
900
)=
1
1
χ 2
(
2008
,
'cash sales'
)
1000
θ 2 ( ω 1 )=
BalanceSheets
(
2009
,
Receipts
,
cash sales
,
det
,
1110
)=
χ 2 (
2009
,
'cash sales'
)
1000
θ 3 ( ω 2 )=
BalanceSheets
(
2008
,
Receipts
,
receivables
,
det
,
100
)=
χ 2 (
2008
,
receivables'
)
200
θ 4 ( ω 2 )=
BalanceSheets
(
2009
,
Receipts
,
receivables
,
det
,
90
)=
χ 2 (
2009
,
receivables'
)
200
Search WWH ::




Custom Search