Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
0
450
900
50
500
950
100
550
1000
150
600
1050
200
650
1100
250
700
1150
300
750
1200
350
800
1250
400
850
1300
450
900
1350
Fig. 7. Successive states of the automata lattice for the Iris dataset
Fig. 7 shows the successive states of the automata lattice. As in the synthetic
case each line represents the tape's line in each iteration. As the Iris dataset
contains three classes we have only employed the black, grey and white colors to
represent the Iris setosa, Iris versicolor and Iris virginica data items, respectively.
The final tape's state is achieved in the iteration 1291 although it is not
obtained a perfect clustering in this case. Only the black zone which represents
the Iris setosa shows a compact state. Some individuals corresponding to the
Iris versicolor (grey cluster) are included in the middle of the Iris virginica zone
(white cluster) and vice versa.
This fact can be clearly observed in the matching matrix shown in Table 1. All
the50Irissetosaitemsareclassifiedinthecorrect cluster, 3 Iris versicolor items
are erroneously classified as Iris virginica, and 1 Iris virginica item is erroneously
classified as Iris versicolor.
Table 1. Iris dataset matching matrix obtained with the proposed algorithm
Iris setosa
Iris versicolor
Iris virginica
Iris setosa
50
0
0
Iris versicolor
0
47
3
Iris virginica
0
1
49
The obtained results are quite comparable to the ones obtained with a con-
ventional k -means algorithm k = 3. The resulting matching matrix is shown in
Table 2.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search