Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
197
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
.8.0
0.26134
0.17923
0.09547
0.01282
-0.06604
-0.13865
-0.20278
-0.25655
-0.29850
-0.32758
-0.34322
-0.34534
-0.33433
-0.31103
-0.27668
-0.23292
-0.18164
-0.12498
-0.06522
-0.00468
0.05433
0.10963
0.15921
0.20136
0.23464
0.48353
0.46972
0.44481
0.40930
0.36413
0.31053
0.25009
0.18459
0.11605
0.04657
-0.02172
-0.08670
-0.14638
-0.19895
-0.24287
-0.27688
-0.30007
-0.31192
-0.31228
-0.30142
-0.27998
-0.24897
-0.20970
-0.16378
-0.11299
0.34307
0.37339
0.39876
0.41803
0.43017
0.43439
0.43013
0.41707
0.39521
0.36483
0.32652
0.28113
0,22978
0.17382
0.11477
0.05428
-0.00591
-0.06406
-0.11847
-0.16756
-0.20987
-0.24420
-0.26958
-0.28535
-0.29113
0.15972
0.18920
0.21980
0.25074
0.28113
0.31003
0.33645
0.35941
0.37796
0.39123
0.39847
0.39906
0.39257
0.37877
0.35764
0.32941
0.29453
0.25368
0.20774
0.15780
0.10509
0.05097
-0.00313
-0.05572
-0.10536
In order to reconcile with the discussion of Wilkins, Stokes and Wilson
(1953), we have plotted J
1
2
(x), J
2
2
(x), J
3
2
(x) and J
4
2
(x) vs. x in Fig. 8-2 with
the values in Table 8-1.
Their first peaks gradually reduce in height, and their half widths increase
only slightly. In order to differentiate them, the most significant feature is
their locations, or the values of x at their first maximums. They are roughly
around 1.8, 3.0, 4.2 and 5.4 respectively. As clearly indicated in Fig. 8-2,
the widths of their first peaks cannot tell them apart at all.
