Geography Reference
In-Depth Information
the users of the data themselves. From this point of view, the most important and
most critical condition of meaningfulness of visualization is its purpose and in
particular the end user.
References
Aipperspach R (2009) Categorization and toolkit support for uncertainty visualization.
http://vis.
Beard MK, Buttenfield BP, Clapham SB (1991) NCGIA research initiative 7: visualization of
spatial data quality. Scientific report for the specialist meeting, 8-12 June 1991, Castine,
Maine. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Blades M, Spencer C (1987) How do people use maps to navigate through the world?
Cartographica 24:64-75
Boukhelifa N, Duke D (2007) The uncertain reality of underground assets. In: Joint workshop on
visualization and exploration of geospatial data, ISPRS, ICA, DGFK, June, pp 27-29
Bourgeois LJ (1985) Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile
environments. Acad Manage J 28:548-573
Brugger W (1994) Filosofick´ slovn´k. Naˇe vojsko, Praha
Brus J (2013) Visualization of uncertainty in environmental studies. Dissertation thesis, Palacky
University Publishing House, 144 pp
Brus J, Dobeˇov´ Z, Kaˇok J (2009) Utilization of expert systems in thematic cartography. In:
International conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems (INCOS 2009),
pp 285-289
Brus J, Dobeˇov´ Z, Kaˇok J, Pechanec V (2010) Design of intelligent system in cartography. In:
9th Roedunet IEEE international conference, pp 112-117
Brus J, Pechanec V, Kilianov´ H (2013) Uncertainty vs. spatial data quality visualisations: a case
study on ecotones. In: 13th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference, v tisku
Buttenfield B (2000) Mapping ecological uncertainty. In: Hunsaker CT, Goodchild MF, Friedl
MA, Case TJ (eds) Spatial uncertainty in ecology. Springer, New York, pp s.116-132
Chrisman NR (1984) The role of quality information in the long-term functioning of a geographic
information system (Part 2: Issues and problems relating to cartographic data use exchange and
transfer). Cartographica 21:79-88
Davis TJ, Keller P (1997) Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and
Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11:5
Devillers R, Stein A, B
´
dard Y, Chrisman N, Fisher P, Shi W (2010) Thirty years of research on
spatial data quality: achievements, failures, and opportunities. Trans GIS 14:387-400
Dobe
ˇ
ov
´
Z, Brus J (2011) Coping with cartographical ontology. In: Conference proceedings
SGEM 2011, 11th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference. STEF92 Technol-
ogy Ltd., Sofia, pp 377-384
Duckham M, Mason K, Stell J, Worboys M (2001) A formal approach to imperfection in
geographic information. Comput Environ Urban Syst 25:89-103
Fabrikant SI (2001) Evaluating the usability of the scale metaphor for querying semantic spaces.
In: Montello DR (ed) Spatial information theory: foundations of geographic information
science. Springer, Berlin, pp 156-172
Fabrikant SI, Buttenfield BP (2001) Formalizing semantic spaces for information access. Ann
Assoc Am Geogr 91:263-280
Fiske ST, Taylor SE (2008) Social cognition: from brains to culture. McGraw-Hill Higher
Education, Boston
Goodchild MF (1992) Geographical information science. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 6:31-45
Hunter GJ (1999) Managing uncertainty in GIS. Geogr Inf Syst 2:633-641
