Organising and Staffing Programmes and Projects - Afforestation, Reforestation and Forest Restoration in Arid and Semi-arid Tropics - page 207

Table 8.2 Evaluation of supervisor's performance
Name of supervisor Year

Sr. No. Factor/aspect Multiplier Level Score

1 Score of plantations/nursery managed 5

2 Amount of work handled 1

3 Presence at site 2

4 Punctuality in work 1

5 Intelligence and aptitude 2

6 Willingness to learn/innovate 3

7 Industriousness 2

8 Discipline and integrity 5

9 Conduct and courtesy 3

10 Motivational aptitude and co-operation 2

11 Ability to enlist people's participation 4

12 Technical knowledge of plantation work 4

13 Technical knowledge of nursery operations 4

14 Record-keeping 1

15 Economy in work expenditure 1

40

Table 8.3 Evaluation of unit manager's performance
Name of unit manager Year

Sr. No. Factor/aspect Multiplier Level Score

1 Score of plantations/nurseries managed 5

2 Amount of work handled 1

3 Time spent in field 2

4 Punctuality in work 1

5 Intelligence and aptitude 2

6 Willingness to learn/innovate 3

7 Industriousness 2

8 Discipline and integrity 5

9 Conduct and courtesy 3

10 Motivational aptitude and co-operation 2

11 Ability to enlist people's participation 4

12 Ability to supervise and guide 3

13 Ability to follow up and monitor 3

14 Leadership skills 4

15 Receptivity to instructions from above 3

16 Promptness in compliance of instructions 2

17 Technical knowledge of plantation work 4

18 Technical knowledge of nursery operations 4

19 Record-keeping and rendering of accounts 1

20 Economy in work expenditure 1

55

chambers of the executives beyond the reach of workers—would easily make a case
for invidious discrimination and negative sentiments. People will not respect the
management if they themselves do not feel respected. They will not belong to the
organisation if they are not equal among others. The mangers must learn to have their