Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
haveappliedawidevarietyofinstrumentaltechniques.Today,themethodofchoiceforthedeter-
mination of artiicial sweeteners in different food matrices is HPLC because of its multianalyte
capability, compatibility with the physicochemical properties of sweeteners, high sensitivity, and
robustness.Duetoaconstantrisingdemandforalternativemethodsfordeterminationofsweeteners,
andduetotherisingdevelopmentofmassspectrometryortandemmassspectrometrymethods,we
willwitnessanumberofproceduresbasedonMScoupledwithLCforthedeterminationofACS-K
andASP.
CEandICarebothinterestingalternativestoHPLC.Theresolvingpowerofthesetechniques
is, in many cases, comparable with that of HPLC, and frequently, their running costs are lower.
However,itseemsthatduetolimitedrobustness,inthecaseofCEmethods,andthemodestchoice
ofseparationmechanisms,inthecaseofIC,thesemethodsarelesspopular.TLCandGChavebeen
appliedoccasionallytoanalysisofartiicialsweeteners.TLCmethodsarecharacterizedbypoorsep-
arationeficiency,andGCmethodsrequirederivatizationthatistimeconsumingandlaborintensive.
Duetoademandforsimple,rapid,andlow-costalternativemethodsfordeterminationofsweeteners,
in many instances, chromatographic methods can be replaced by electroanalytical, spectroscopic,
orFIprocedures.Someofthemareevenmoresensitiveandselectiveandrequireverylittlesample
preparation.Unfortunately,theirapplicationsarelimitedtooneortwosweetenersonly.
However,therestillremainsthechallengeofdevelopingstable,reliable,androbustmethodsfor
thedeterminationofartiicialsweetenersindificultfoodmatrices.Robustandreliableanalytical
methodsareessentialtomeettheneedsofgrowingmarketsinqualitycontrolandconsumersafety.
reFereNCeS
Alfaya,R.V.S.,Alfaya,A.A.S.,Gushikem,Y.etal.2000.Ionselectiveelectrodeforpotentiometricdeter-
minationofsaccharinusingathinilmofsilsesquioxane3-n-propylpyridiniumchloridepolymercoated
graphiterod.
Anal. Lett.
33:2859-71.
Álvarez-Romero,G.A.,Lozada-Ascencio,S.M.,Rodriguez-Ávila,J.A.,Galán-Vidal,C.A.,Páez-Hernandez,
M.E.2010.Potentiometricquantificationofsaccharinbyusingselectiveformedbypyrroleelectropoly-
merization.
Food Chem
.120(4):1250-4.
Armenta,S.,Garrigues,S.,delaGuardia,M.2004.Sweetenersdeterminationintabletopformulationsusing
FT-Ramanspectrometryandchemometricanalysis.
Anal. Chim. Acta
521:149-55.
Armenta, S., Garrigues, S., de la Guardia M. 2004. FTIR determination of aspartame and acesulfame-K in
tabletopsweeteners.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
52(26):7798-803.
Arnold,D.L.1984.Toxicologyofsaccharin.
Fundam. Appl. Toxicol.
4:674-85.
Arnold,D.L.,Krewski,D.,Munro,I.C.1983.Saccharin:Atoxicologicalandhistoricalperspective.
Toxicology
27:179-256.
Assumpcao,M.H.M.T.,Medeiros,R.A.,Madi,A.etal.2008.Developmentofabiamperometricprocedure
forthedeterminationofsaccharinindietaryproducts.
Quimica Nova
31(7):1743-6.
Baranowska,I.,Zydron,M.,Szczepanik,K.2004.TLCintheanalysisoffoodadditives.
J. Planar Chromatogr.-
Mod. TLC
17(1):54-7.
Baron,R.F.,Hanger,L.Y.1998.Usingacidlevel,acesulfamepotassiumaspartameblendratioandlavortype
todetermineoptimumlavorproilesoffruitlavoredbeverages.
J. Sensory Studies
13:269-83.
Barrado,E.,Rodriguez,J.A.,Castrillejo,Y.2006.Renewablestationaryphaseliquidmagnetochromatography:
Determiningaspartameanditshydrolysisproductsindietsoftdrinks.
Anal. Bioanal. Chem.
385:1233-40.
Biemer,T.A.1989.Analysisofsaccharin,acesulfame-Kandsodiumcyclamatebyhighperformanceionchro-
matography.
J. Chromatogr.
463:463-8.
Boyce, M. C. 1999. Simultaneous determination of antioxidants, preservatives and sweeteners permitted as
additivesinfoodbymixedmicellarelectrokineticchromatography.
J. Chromatogr. A
847:369-75.
Buduwy,S.S.,Issa,Y.M.,Tag-Eldin,A.S.1996.PotentiometricdeterminationofL-dopa,carbidopa,methyl-
dopa and aspartame using a new trinitrobenzenesulfonate selective electrode.
Electroanalysis
8(11):
1060-4.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search