Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
process. In this context, the ontology of method would get rich dynamically. During
service design and request formulation, new terms could be added to the ontology in
order to extend knowledge on methods through the community. In this way, knowl-
edge on methods can be shared by “consumers” and “providers” of services through
the use of internet based communication technologies.
The need to develop service request languages suitable for IS developers require-
ments. A service request language and its appropriate run-time support environment
is required to allow IS developers to express their needs on the basis of the charac-
teristics and functionality of standard methods whose services are found in service
registries. A service request language must provide a formal means of describ-
ing desired method attributes and functionality, including both method preferences
and practice of the consumer (IS developer) and context and constraints of the
project.
The need to address service composition at the semantic level . One of the most
challenging areas in method engineering is the process of combining and aggre-
gating several method fragments in order to construct new method fragments. In
service-oriented computing, efforts have been made aiming at developing syntactic
techniques to automatically compose different services. We argue that goal orienta-
tion as a fundamental principle in service specification must be considered as a key
concept to address service composition at the semantic level. In method engineering,
this kind of composition would help to design new methods more systematically.
References
1. Brinkkemper S (1996) Method engineering: engineering of information systems development
methods and tools. J Info Softw Technol 38(4):275-280
2. Brinkkemper S, Saeki M, Harmsen F (1998) Assembly techniques for method engineer-
ing. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on advanced information systems
engineering (CAISE'98). LNCS, vol 1413. Springer, pp 381-400
3. Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR, Benjamins R (1998) The ontology of tasks and methods.
In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on knowledge acquisition modeling and
management, KAW'98, Banff, Canada
4. Chesbrough H, Spohrer J (2006) A research manifesto for services science. Commun ACM
49(7):35-40
5. Gonzalez-Perez C, Henderson-Sellers B (2006) A powertype-based metamodelling frame-
work. Softw Systems Modeling 5(1):72-90
6. Guzélian G (2007) Conception de systèmes d'information: une approche orientée service.
Thèse de l'Université Paul Cézanne, Aix-Marseille 3, Juillet
7. Guzélian G, Cauvet C (2007) SO2M: Towards a service-oriented approach for method
engineering. In: Proceedings of international conference on information and knowledge
engineering, IKE'07, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
8. Heineman GT, Councill WT (2001) Component-based software engineering, putting the
pieces together. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading MA
9.
Iacovelli, A, Souveyet, C, Rolland, C (2008) Method as a service (MaaS). In: Proceedings of
international conference on research and challenges of information systems, RCIS'08, IEEE
10.
International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission:
Software engineering - metamodel
for development methodologies ISO/IEC 24744.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search