A Method for Capturing and Reconciling Stakeholder Intentions Based on the Formal Concept Analysis - Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering - page 172

We demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the presented method by
applying the method to self-checkout systems for large-scale supermarkets.
As the conclusion, the presented method enables to systematically elicit stake-
holders' intentions in the development of complex large-scale information systems.
Unlike conventional techniques, the proposed method employs information from a
number of people in a set of stakeholder groups. It is particularly useful to the infor-
mation systems for public services and consumer products, to which stakeholders
are diverse.
Acknowledgments The author thanks to Kayo Suzuki, Tamami Murase, and Nobotu Nakamichi
for their collaboration in conducting the case study.
References
1. Anton A (1996) Goal-based requirements analysis. In: Proceedings of ICRE'96, IEEE CS,
Los Alamitos, CA, pp 136-144
2. Aoyama M (2007) Persona-scenario-goal methodology for user-centered requirements engi-
neering. In: Proceedings of RE 2007, IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 185-194
3. Avery P (2008) Self-service at supermarkets and grocery stores. White paper. NetWorld
alliance. http://www.selfserviceworld.com/white_paper.php?id = 72 . Accessed 31 Jan 2010
4. Dabholkar PA, Bobbitt LM, Lee E-J (2003) Understanding consumer motivation and behavior
related to self-scanning in retailing. Int J Service Industry Manag 14(1):59-95
5. Darke P, Shanks, G (1996) Stakeholder viewpoints in requirements definition: a framework
for understanding viewpoint development approach. Reqs Eng J 1(2):88-105
6. Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B, Finkelstein L, Goedicke M (1992) Viewpoints: a frame-
work for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng
2(1):31-58
7. Glinz M, Wieringa RJ (2007) Stakeholders in requirements engineering. IEEE Softw
24(2):18-20
8. Hesse W, Tilley T (2005) Formal concept analysis used for software analysis and
modeling. In: Formal concept analysis. LNCS, vol 3626. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
pp 288-303
9. van Lamsweerde A (2001) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In:
Proceedings of RE'01, IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 249-262
10. Nuseibeh B, Kramer J, Finkelstein A (1994) A framework for expressing the relation-
ships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 20(10):
760-773
11. Rolland C, Souveyet C, Ben Achour C (1998) Guiding goal modeling using scenarios. IEEE
Trans Softw Eng 24(12):1055-1071
12. Rolland C, Grosz G, Kla R (1999) Experience with goal-scenario coupling in requirements
engineering. In: Proceedings of RE'99, IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 74-81
13. Rolland C, Salinesi C (2005) Modeling goals and reasoning with them. In: Aurum, A, Wohlin
C (eds) Engineering and managing software requirements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
pp 189-217
14. Rolland C (2008) Intention driven conceptual modelling. In: Johannesson P, Söderström E
(eds) Information systems engineering: from data analysis to process networks, IGI Global,
Hershey, pp 16-42
15. Snelting G (2005) Concept lattices in software analysis. In: Formal concept analysis. LNCS,
vol 3626. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 272-282
16. Sommerville I, Sawyer P, Viller S (1998) Viewpoints for requirements elicitation: a practical
approach. In: Proceedings of RE 1998, IEEE CS, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 74-81