Requirements as Goals and Commitments Too - Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering - page 150

References
1. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 (April 2007)
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.html. Accessed 6 May 2010
2. BPMN: Business process modeling notation, v1.1 (January 2008) http://www.bpmn.org/.
Accessed 6 May 2010
3. Bratman ME (1987) Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University, Cambridge,
MA
4. Bresciani P, Perini A, Giorgini P, Giunchiglia F, Mylopoulos J (2004) Tropos: an agent-
oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Systems
8(3):203-236
5. Bryl V, Giorgini P, Mylopoulos J (2009) Designing socio-technical systems: from stakeholder
goals to social networks. Reqs Eng 14(1):47-70
6. Chopra AK, Singh MP (2008) Constitutive interoperability. In: Proceedings of the seventh
international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 797-804, Estoril,
Portugal
7. Chopra AK, Singh MP (2009) Multiagent commitment alignment. In: Proceedings of the
eighth international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Budapest
Hungary, pp 937-944
8. Chopra AK, Singh MP (2009) An architecture for multiagent systems: an approach based on
commitments. In: Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on programming multi-agent
systems, Budapest Hungary
9. Cohen PR, Levesque HJ (1990) Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence
42:213-261
10. Dardenne A, van Lamsweerde A, Fickas S (1993) Goal-directed requirements acquisition.
Science Computer Programming 20(1-2):3-50
11. Desai N, Mallya AU, Chopra AK, Singh MP (2005) Interaction protocols as design abstrac-
tions for business processes. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31(12):1015-1027
12. Desai N, Chopra AK, Arrott M, Specht B, Singh MP (2007) Engineering foreign exchange
processes via commitment protocols. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference
on services computing, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 514-521
13. Desai N, Chopra AK, Singh MP (2007) Representing and reasoning about commitments
in business processes. In: Proceedings of the 22nd conference on artificial intelligence,
Vancouver, pp 1328-1333
14. Desai N, Chopra AK, Singh MP (2010) Amoeba: a methodology for modeling and evolution
of cross-organizational business processes. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 19(2):6:1-6:45
15. Emery FE (1959) Characteristics of sociotechnical systems. Travistock Institute of Human
Relations, London
16. Fornara N, Colombetti M (2002) Operational specification of a commitment-based agent com-
munication language. In: Proceedings of the 1st international joint conference on autonomous
agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS), ACM, Bologna, Italy, pp 535-542
17. Fornara N, Colombetti M (2004) A commitment-based approach to agent communication.
Applied Artificial Intelligence 18(9-10):853-866
18. Giorgini P, Mylopoulos J, Nicchiarelli E, Sebastiani R (2003) Reasoning with goal models. In:
Conceptual modeling—ER 2002. LNCS, vol 2503. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 167-181
19. Gordijn J, Yu E, van der Raadt B (2006) E-service design using i ∗ and e3value modeling.
IEEE Softw 23(3):26-33
20. Guizzardi RSS, Guizzardi G, Perini A, Mylopoulos J (2007) Towards an ontological account
of agent-oriented goals. In: Software engineering for multi-agent systems V. LNCS, vol 4408.
Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 148-164
21. Kaabi RS, Souveyet C, Rolland C (2004) Eliciting service composition in a goal driven
manner. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on service oriented computing,
New York, pp 308-315