Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
103. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Israel Profile: Biolog-
ical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
Israel/index.html
104. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Kazakhstan Profile: Bio-
logical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
Kazakhstan/index.html
105. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Libya Profile: Bio-
logical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
Libya/index.html
106. Federation of American Scientists. DPRK:
Biological Weapons Program. http://www.fas.
org/nuke/guide/dprk/bw/index.html
107. GlobalSecurity.org. DPRK: Biological Weapons
Program. http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/
world/dprk/bw.htm
108. Nuclear Threat Initiative. NorthKorea Profile: Bio-
logical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
NK/index.html
109. Federation of American Scientists. Pakistan:
Biological Weapons. http://www.fas.org/nuke/
guide/pakistan/bw/index.html
110. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Pakistan Profile: Bio-
logical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
Pakistan/index.html
111. G. H. W. Bush. President's Statement. April 13,
1989. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/
mi_m1079/is_n2147_v89/ai_7723219
112. D. Shoham. Does Saudi Arabia have or seek
chemical or biological weapons?
The Nonprolif-
eration Review
. 6:122-130, 1999.
113. Nuclear Threat Initiative. SouthAfricaProfile: Bio-
logical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
SAfrica/index.html
114. Federation of American Scientists. South
Africa: Chemical and Biological Weapons.
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/rsa/cbw/index.
html
115. C. Gould and P. L. Folb. The South African chem-
ical and biological warfare program: an overview.
The Nonproliferation Review
. 7:10-23, 2000.
116. Nuclear Threat Initiative. SouthKorea Profile: Bio-
logical. http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/
SKorea/index.html
117. CNS. Weapons of Mass Destruction in
the Middle East. http://cns.miis.edu/research/
wmdme/sudan.htm
118. M. Z. Diab. Syria's chemical and biological
weapons: assessing capabilities and motivations.
The Nonproliferation Review
. 4:104-111, 1997.
119. GlobalSecurity.org. Syria: Biological Weapons.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/syria/
bw.htm
120. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Syria Profile: Biolog-
ical Overview. http://www.nti.org/e_research/
profiles/Syria/Biological/3338.html#fnB4
121. A. Cordesman. Weapons of Mass Destruction in
theMiddle East. Regional Trends, National Forces,
Warfighting Capabilities, Delivery Options,
and Weapons Effects. Center for Strategic and
International Studies. Washington, D.C. October
4, 1999. http://www.csis.org/mideast/reports/
WMDinMETrends.pdf
122. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Taiwan
Overview: Biological. http://www.nti.org/
e_research/profiles/Taiwan/index.html
123. E. A. Willis. Seascape with monkeys and
guinea pigs: Britain's biological weapons research
programme, 1948-1954.
Med Conflict Survival
.
19:285-302, 2003.
124. Nuclear Threat Initiative. Uzbekistan
Overview: Biological. http://www.nti.org/
e_research/profiles/Uzbekistan/1633.html
125.
J. Miller. October 23, U.S. agrees to clean
up anthrax site in Uzbekistan.
The New York
Times
, 2001.
126.
J. B. Tucker, et al., Biological Contamina-
tion of Vozrozhdeniye Island: The U.S.-Uzbek
Agreement. Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
Monterey Institute of
International Studies.
Briefing Series, 2002.
127. S. A. Kolavic, A. Kimura, S. L. Simons,
L. Slutsker, S. Barth, and C. E. Haley.
An outbreak of shigella dysenteriae type 2
among laboratory workers due to intentional
food
contamination.
JAMA
.
278:
396-398,
1997.
128. Center for Nonproliferation Studies. CNS
Reports. Chronology of incidents involving ricin.
http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/reports/ricin_chron.htm
129.
J. B. Tucker. The “Yellow Rain” controversy:
lessons for arms control compliance.
The Nonpro-
liferation Review
. 8:25-42, 2001.
