Database Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 3. Selected association rules mined from the SASA data derived from WT-TTR MD unfolding
simulations. These rules were selected from the subset of rules common to the largest number of MD
simulations. All the amino-acid residues listed in each rule are hydrophobic and have SASA value between
0% and 25%. The Support value (%) for each rule in a particular data set and the lowest Confidence
value (%) obtained for the association rule in the data sets are reported. Labelled with × are rules not
identified in a particular data set.
Association Rule
Support
Confidence
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run 5
AR1
Leu12
Ala25 & Ile73 & Phe95
30.709
×
47.082
51.456
×
92.966
AR2
Leu12
Phe33 & Ile107 & Ala109
48.819
×
37.995
42.632
×
90.127
×
×
AR3
Leu12
Pro11 & Val14 & Val28
51.419
56.455
37.591
98.236
AR4
Leu12
Val16 & Val32 & Leu58
48.569
×
×
52.281
64.721
97.828
AR5
Trp79
Val32 & Ala91 & Ala108
32.271
×
70.754
53.093
×
90.663
AR6
Ile107
Ala25 & Ile73 & Leu111
34.521
×
50.531
53.093
×
93.892
AR7
Leu111
Leu12 & Phe64 & Ala109
44.569
×
×
71.766
30.305
94.040
Although in Table 3 only 7 out of a total 98 rules
co-occurring in three of the sets of association rules
are shown, it generally describes the structure of
the rules obtained. We found out that only a small
subset of the hydrophobic residues appears in the
consequent member of the rules: Leu12 (57 rules),
Trp79 (17 rules), Ile107 (23 rules) and Leu111
(1 rule). The distribution of these residues in the
native structure of WT-TTR is shown in Figure 4.
Furthermore, we also observed that (i) all 98 rules
can be derived for data sets Run 1 and Run 4, (ii)
none of the 98 rules can be derived for data set
Run 2, and (iii) if one rule is derived for data set
Run 3, then it was not derived for data set Run 5,
and vice-versa. Driven by these observations, we
analysed the residues involved in these association
rules, and their SASA behaviour.
First, for the amino-acid residues involved
in the 98 rules co-occurring in three of the sets
of association rules two major SASA variation
profiles are observed: (i) the amino-acid residues
maintain the same values of solvent exposure
throughout the entire simulations; or (ii) at some
point of the simulation the amino-acid residues
move rapidly from positions of low exposure (≤
25%) to positions of high exposure ( ~ 100%).
This is the most frequent SASA variation profile
observed. Furthermore, these rules are describing
mainly events in the beginning of the simulation
when the conformations are more closely related
to the native structure of WT-TTR. Thus, for most
rules what we observe is the point in time in the
unfolding process that an event occurs which
drives the rupture of some structures, mainly in
β-strands A, B, F and G, causing the residues to
move to positions of high exposure to the solvent.
The data also shows that a group of residues as-
sociated with Trp79 maintains positions of low
exposure to the solvent till late in Run 3 and Run 4
( ~ 6th ns), but in Run 1 they move to positions of
high exposure much earlier, around the 3rd ns.
Second, particular subsets of rules occur dis-
jointly in different data sets. This seems to indi-
cate a degree of similarity/dissimilarity between
different simulations. In a sense, it is shown that
specific subsets of hydrophobic residues undergo
different unfolding routes: particular groups of
hydrophobic residues relate in a similar manner
in some simulations, but not in others. Based on
the 98 association rules found to occur in three
data sets, we identified the group of residues
responsible for the differences observed: Pro11,
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search