Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
where
2
ζ
I n
0
2
Z
=
(6.16)
0 T
(
1
ζ )
Define matrix K as
A T A
ζ
A T b
ζ ( 1 ζ )
= Z T [ A ; b ] T [ A ; b ] Z 1
1
2
K = Z T RZ 1
=
b T A
ζ (
b T b
1 ζ
1
ζ )
A
2 ζ ;
2
= [ A
b ] Z 1
b
2 ( 1 ζ )
2
2
;
=
(6.17)
2
and the corresponding eigendecomposition is given by
V T KV = diag 1 , ... , α n + 1 ) = D α
(6.18)
The eigenvector matrix Y is defined as
Y = y 1 , ... , y n + 1 = Z 1 V
(6.19)
and is D -orthogonal; that is,
Y T DY
=
I
(6.20)
Hence, i , y i ) is an eigenpair of the symmetric positive definite pencil ( R , D ) .
From a MCA (minor components analysis) point of view, the theory above
can be reformulated as a Rayleigh quotient:
T
u T Ru
u T Du =
u T Ru
u T Z T Zu
1
2 ( Ax b )
( Ax b )
E GeTLS ( x ) =
=
(
1
ζ ) + ζ
x T x
T Z T RZ 1
T K v
v
= v
v
= v
= E MCA (v)
(6.21)
v
T
v
T
v
where
u = Z 1
v
(6.22)
c of E MCA correspond to the columns of matrix V defined
in eq. (6.18). Hence, eq. (6.22) corresponds to eq. (6.19). The associated eigen-
values α i are the corresponding values of E GeTLS From a theoretical point of
view, this equivalence GeTLS MCA has very important implications; the MCA
theory [30] can be used for explaining the GeTLS behavior for all values of the
parameter ζ . From a numerical point of view, it means that like the MCA EXIN
algorithm (neuron) [30] (basically, a gradient flow of the Rayleigh quotient),
The critical vectors v
Search WWH ::




Custom Search