Pelvis Model for Reconstruction with Autografted Long Bones following Hindquarter Amputation - Computational Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System - page 138

Shim V. B., J. Böshme, P. Vaitl, C. Josten, and I. A. Anderson. 2011. An efficient and accurate prediction of
the stability of percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures with finite element simulation. Journal of
Biomechanical Engineering 133: 094501.
Small S. R., M. E. Berend, L. A. Howard, D. Tunç, C. A. Buckley, and M. A. Ritter. 2013. Acetabular cup stiff-
ness and implant orientation change acetabular loading patterns. The Journal of Arthroplasty 28: 359-67.
Sneppen O., T. Johansen, J. Heerfordt, I. Dissing, and O. Petersen O. 1978. Hemipelvectomy. Postoperative
rehabilitation assessed on the basis of 41 cases. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 49: 175-9.
Wang S., J. Xiong, C. Zhan et al. 2012. The anatomy of proximal femoral autografts for pelvic reconstruction:
a cadaveric study. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 34: 305-9.
Yu B. S., X. M. Zhuang, Z. M. Li et al. 2010. Biomechanical effects of the extent of sacrectomy on the stability
of lumbo-iliac reconstruction using iliac screw techniques: What level of sacrectomy requires the bilat-
eral dual iliac screw technique? Clinical Biomechanics 25: 867-72.
Zhang Q. H., J. Y. Wang, C. Lupton et al. 2010. A subject-specific pelvic bone model and its application to
cemented acetabular replacements. Journal of Biomechanics 43: 2722-7.
Zhou Y., L. Min, Y. Liu et al. 2013. Finite element analysis of the pelvis after modular hemipelvic endoprosthe-
sis reconstruction. International Orthopaedics 37: 653-8.
Zhu R., L. Cheng, Y. Yu, T. Zander, B. Chen, and A. Rohlmann. 2012. Comparison of four reconstruction meth-
ods after total sacrectomy: a finite element study. Clinical Biomechanics 27: 771-6.