Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
framework to define the contours of a space of acceptable practices to
replace the 'rigid line to be followed'. The exchanges between workers
implementing this method would likely help construct a shared frame-
work of reference, by tracing together the path for the expression of man-
age d s a f e t y.
References
Amalberti, R. (1992). Safety in process-control: an operator-centred point of view.
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
, 38, 99-108.
Amalberti, R. (2007). Ultrasécurité, une épée de Damoclès pour les hautes tech-
nologies.
Dossiers de la Recherche
, 26, 74-81.
Amalberti, R., Auroy, Y., Berwick, D., and Barach, P. (2005). Five system barriers to
achieving ultrasafe health care.
Annals of Internal Medicine
, 142(9), 756-764.
Bourrier, M. (2001).
Organiser la fiabilité.
. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Cuvelier, C. (2011).
De la gestion des risques ̀ la gestion des ressources de
l'activité - Étude de la résilience en anesthésie pédiatrique. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, CNAM, Paris.
Cuvelier, L., and Falzon, P. (2010). Coping with uncertainty: resilient decisions
in anaesthesia. In E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. Woods, and J. Wreathall (Eds.),
Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook
(pp. 29-43). Aldershot, UK:
Ashgate.
Cuvelier, L., Falzon, P., Granry, J. C., Moll, M. C., and Orliaguet, G. (2012). Planning
safe anesthesia: the role of collective resources management.
International
Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine
, 24, 125-136.
Daniellou, F. (2012).
Facteurs humains et organisationnels de la sécurité industrielle. Des
questions pour progresser.
Toulouse: FonCSI.
Daniellou, F., Simard, M., and Boissières, I. (2011). Human and organizational
factors of safety, state of the art.
Cahiers de la sécurité industrielle 2011-01
,
Toulouse: FONCSI. www.icsi-eu.org.
de Terssac, G., and Gaillard, I. (2009). Règle et sécurité: partir des pratiques pour
définir les règles. In G. de Terssac, I. Boissières, and I. Gaillard (Eds.),
La secu-
rite en action
(pp. 13-34). Toulouse: Octarès.
de Terssac, G., and Mignard, J. (2011).
Les paradoxes de la sécurité. Le cas d'AZF
. Paris:
PUF.
Dekker, S. (2003). Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on
procedures and safety.
Applied Ergonomics
, 34, 233-238.
Dicioccio, A. (2012). Articuler sécurité et performance: les décisions d'arbitrage
dans le risque en aéronautique. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, CNAM,
Paris.
Dien, Y. (1998). Safety and application of procedures, or how do “they” have to use
operating procedures in nuclear power plants?
Safety Science
, 29(3), 179-187.
Dien, Y. (2011). Sécurité réglée, sécurité gérée: une problématique ̀ redéinir?
Presented at Les entretiens du Risques 2011, Institut de Maîtrise des Risques,
Gentilly.
Falzon, P. (2011). Rule-based safety vs adaptive safety: an articulation issue.
Presented at 3rd International Conference on Health Care Systems,
Ergonomics and Patient Safety (HEPS), Oviedo, Spain.
