Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
As a second possibility, choose a trial solution with
2
3
N
u
1
(ξ )
=
(ξ
−
ξ
)
3
4
N
u
2
(ξ )
=
(ξ
−
ξ
)
(14)
4
5
N
u
3
(ξ )
=
(ξ
−
ξ
)
Here,
N
u
1
is the same as the previous case, the combination
b
1
=
b
2
=
b
3
=
0
,b
4
=
1
,
and
b
5
=−
1 substituted in (4) leads to
N
u
2
,
and
N
u
3
is a higher order polynomial which satisfies
the required displacement boundary conditions. Our trial deflection is
w
1
2
3
3
4
4
5
w
w(ξ)
=
[
(ξ
−
ξ
)ξ
−
ξ
)ξ
−
ξ
)
]
(15)
2
w
3
For this assumption, we obtain
2
2
3
2
3
4
4
−
24
ξ
+
36
ξ
12
ξ
−
60
ξ
+
72
ξ
24
ξ
−
112
ξ
+
120
ξ
L
4
1
0
EI
2
3
4
3
4
5
k
u
=
36
ξ
−
144
ξ
+
144
ξ
72
ξ
−
264
ξ
+
240
ξ
dx
(16)
4
5
6
Symmetric
144
ξ
−
480
ξ
+
400
ξ
dx
/
1
1
1
30
ξ
2
−
ξ
3
N
u
dx
ξ
3
−
ξ
4
/
p
u
=
p
z
(
x
)
=
p
0
(
1
−
ξ)
=
p
0
L
1
60
(17)
0
0
4
5
ξ
−
ξ
1
/
105
The equations for
w
are
44
4
w
1
/
30
1
=
424
/
5 6
/
5
w
p
0
L
1
/
60
EI
L
3
2
(18)
w
/
426
/
5
208
/
35
1
105
3
k
u
w
=
p
u
which provides the solution
p
0
L
4
120
EI
[4
T
w
=
−
41
(19)
Let us compare both of the above results with the exact solution.
A. Exact solution:
p
0
L
4
120
EI
(
2
3
4
5
w(ξ)
=
ξ
−
ξ
+
ξ
−
ξ
)
4
8
5
B. Trial Deflection with
m
=
2:
p
0
L
4
120
EI
(
2
3
4
w(ξ)
=
3
.
5
ξ
−
6
ξ
+
2
.
5
ξ
)
C. Trial Deflection with
m
=
3:
p
0
L
4
120
EI
(
2
3
4
5
w(ξ)
=
4
ξ
−
8
ξ
+
5
ξ
−
ξ
)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search