Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Then Eq. (2.116) becomes
L
M dx
V
k s GA δ
M
EI δ
V + θδ
M
V
V
θδ
0
=−
V L
0 θδ
M L
0 + (w w) δ
M L
0
V
+ θ)δ
on S
on S
on S u
or
V
k s GA δ
M dx
L
L
M
EI δ
V w δ
M θ)
V
+
V
θ + δ
dx
0
0
=−
M L
0
M L
0
V
+ θδ
V
+ θδ
(2.119) or (D)
on S p
on S u
The classical theorem would require the underlined term to be dropped because they rep-
resent statically admissible boundary conditions and equilibrium.
2.4.5
Generalized Principles
The classical variational principles for a beam are summarized in Table 2.5. These funda-
mental forms can be combined to form the generalized principles as follows:
A
+
B
=
AB
C
+
D
=
CD
A
+
D
=
AD
C
+
B
=
CB
For example, consider the C
+
B combination,
V
dx
L
V
k s GA
V
δ
M
M
EI
δ
(δθ + δw ) +
δθ + θ δ
(w + θ)
M
M
+ δ
V
0
L
V
δθ L
0
p z δw
dx
δw +
M
0
on S p
δ V
θ) L
(w w) +
M
0 =
0
(2.120) or (CB)
on S u
In matrix notation this symmetric principle is the same as Eq. (7) of Example 2.11. Other
generalized forms can be derived in a similar fashion.
2.5
Structure of the Differential and Integral Forms
of the Governing Equations
The general form of the basic equations given in Chapter 1 and in this chapter is shown in
Table 2.6. The equations are arranged such that the dual character of the principle of virtual
work C and the principle of complementary virtual work D is evident. The local equations
corresponding to principle C are the equilibrium conditions A and the force boundary con-
ditions A B , with the kinematic equations B and the displacement boundary conditions B B
as side conditions to be satisfied a priori. The reverse holds for principle D in a fully dual
Search WWH ::




Custom Search