Geology Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 3.4 K 2 O/Al 2 O 3 versus
mg-number variation in
ultrapotassic rocks (after
Foley et al. 1987)
1.6
1.4
1.2
Group I
1.0
0.8
0.6
Group II
0.4
Group III
0.2
0.0
40
50
60
100Mg/ (Mg+Fe)
70
80
Fig. 3.5 CaO versus MgO
variation in ultrapotassic
rocks (after Foley et al. 1987)
18
16
14
Group III
Group II
12
10
8
Group I
6
4
2
0
0
2
468101214 16 18
20 22
24
26
28 30
MgO (Wt. %)
common. High SiO 2 content does not allow crystallization of such silica-undersat-
urated accessory minerals, as kalsilite, melilite, perovskite, priderite and wadeite. The
nodules are clinopyroxene-rich rocks, and have been described from Alban Hills,
Roccamon
na and Somma-Vesuvius.
The group IV rocks are those, which cannot be included in either of the three
groups. The type examples of group IV rocks are the potassic rocks of Navajo
volcanic
field, which lack mantle-derived xenoliths.
The major problem related to this type of grouping of K-rich rocks such as group 1,
group 2 (K-rich rocks), group 3 (K-rich rocks) and group 4 (K-rich rocks) (I, II, III
and IV), lies in the fact that the rocks of all four groups have been described from
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search