Issues of Law Raised by Developments and Use of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense - Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense - page 165

Shuster, E. 1997. “Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg code.” The New England
Journal of Medicine 337:1426-1440. www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/.
Spranger, T. 2012. International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis. London: Springer.
Truthful Brain Corporation. www.truthfulbrain.com. Accessed September 10, 2013.
Terry, J. 2001. “The lawfulness of attacking computer networks in armed conflict and in
self-defense in periods short of armed conflict: What are the targeting constraints?”
Military Law Review 169:70-91.
U.N. General Assembly. 1945. “Charter of the United Nations, 24 October, 1 UNTS XVI.”
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/index.shtml.
U.N. General Asssembly. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights . 217A (III). Article 1,
18. www.un.org/en/documents/udhr.
United States War Crimes Act of 1996. 18 U.S.C 2401. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-
104publ192/pdf/PLAW-104publ192.pdf.
Vaseashta, A., E. Braman, and P. Sussman, eds. 2012. Technological Innovation and Ecological
Terrorism (NATO Science for Peace and Security Series). New York: Springer.
White, S. 2008. “Brave new world: Neurowarfare and the limits of international humanitarian
law.” Cornell International Law Journal 41(2):177-210.
Whitehouse.gov. 2013. “Statement by the President on Syria, August 31, 2013.” http://www
.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/31/statement-president-syria.
Wingfield-Hayes, R. 2013. “Why Japan's 'Fukushina 50' remain unknown.” BBC News . www
.bbc.com/news/world-asia-20707753.
World Medical Association. 1964. “Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical
research involving human subjects.” Adopted by the 18th World Medical Association
General Assembly. Helsinki, Finland. www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.