Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
communities have ownership and are more confident in testing and adapting
innovations.
When carefully planned and implemented, this approach facilitates
adoption and reduces the long process of technology transfer from research
stations to the farmers (Leakey
et al.
, 2005; Chapter 6, this volume), and also
avoids the replacement of landraces with improved varieties, which causes
genetic erosion (Chapter 6). Participatory domestication approaches have been
applied in West Africa for
Dacryodes edulis
and
Irvingia gabonensis
(Tchoundjeu
et al.
, 2006; Chapter 9, this volume),
Uapaca kirkiana
and
Strychnos cocculoides
in Malawi (Chapter 8), and for
Bactris gasipaes
and
Inga
edulis
in Peru (Weber
et al.
, 2001; Chapter 6, this volume). The participatory
clonal selection strategy in southern Africa involved the following activities
(Akinnifesi
et al.
, 2006): (i) priority-setting using stakeholder workshops; (ii)
household surveys and market surveys; (iii) product prioritization; (iv)
identifying natural stands of priority IFTs through reconnaissance surveys; (v)
village workshops to define fruit traits and joint selection of elite cultivars with
communities - farmers, marketers, village leaders and schoolchildren; (vi)
systematic naming of trees, collection of seeds and vegetative propagules,
nursery evaluation, and field orchard testing of clonal selections until a smaller
number of true-to-type and true-to-name cultivars were obtained; (vii) release
of superior cultivars for adoption, testing and scaling-up. Detailed principles
and strategies for participatory domestication based on clonal selection and
vegetative propagation have been described by Leakey and Akinnifesi
(Chapter 2). Cornelius
et al.
(2006) and Weber
et al.
(2001) have detailed its
application to seedlings.
21.3.5 Propagation as a tool for improvement
Participatory domestication, in which farmers are trained to use vegetative
propagation techniques, would enable farmers in different locations to select
cultivars for different sets of characteristics, thus ensuring in the short to
medium term that farm-level inter- and intraspecific diversity is maintained
(Leakey
et al.
, 1990, 2003; Akinnifesi
et al.
, 2006a; Schreckenberg
et al.
, 2006;
Tchoundjeu
et al.
, 2006; Chapters 2, 8, 9, this volume).
Mature tissues have the capacity to flower and fruit, and can be multiplied
or captured through grafting, budding and air-layering (Leakey
et al.
, 1990,
2005; Chapters 2, 8-10, this volume), and micropropagation (Mng'omba,
2007; Mng'omba
et al.
, 2007a, b). Because of the ease of propagating juvenile
tissues by cuttings, this has been the preferred option for participatory
domestication of short-gestation fruit trees such as
Dacryodes edulis
in village
nurseries in West Africa (Leakey
et al.
, 2005; Chapter 9, this volume). In
addition, the tissue culture of juvenile tissues has proved more successful than
that of matured tissues for miombo fruit trees such as
U. kirkiana
(Mn'gomba,
2007; Mn'gomba
et al.
, 2007a). Stem cutting was unsuccessful for most
miombo fruit trees (Mhango and Akinnifesi, 2001; Akinnifesi
et al.
, 2004a,
2006), and the tissue culture of
U. kirkiana
was limited by phenolic
Search WWH ::
Custom Search