Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
100
90
80
70
Revenue
Material Cost
Storage Cost
Result (Utility)
60
50
40
30
17.32
14.67
20
11.87
9.15
6.19
2.53
10
0
100
80
60
Revenue
Material Cost
Storage Cost
Result (Utility)
40
20
7.52
8.82
7.82
3.98
4.83
0
-5.70
-20
Fig. 1.
Top: Average score of Socrates using EMAMS in quarter finals. Bottom: Average score of
Socrates using MAMS-SO in semi-finals.
100
100
90
90
77
73
80
80
71
71
64
70
61
61
70
61
53
59
60
60
48
50
50
38
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2.
Factory utilisation of Socrates with: (a) EMAMS in quarter finals; and (b) MAMS-SO in
semi-finals
good in most of the games. The results from this round for group D are summarized in
Fig. 1(a), 2(a) and 3(a).
Based on the quarter final results Socrates qualified for the semi-finals. The semifi-
nal round which involved 16 games was a highly competitive environment with agents
with very similar strategies procuring components on day 0. In this round, Socrates
played with the MAMS-SO strategy. The strategy was not able to succeed in this
